My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE33307
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE33307
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:51 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:42:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981018
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
1/24/1994
Doc Name
C-81-018 NOV C-93-156 COMPACTION TESTING PLAN WASTE PILE 4
From
DMG
To
BARBARA PAVLIK
Violation No.
CV1993156
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ i III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: (303)866-3567 <br />FAX: (3031832-8106 <br />To: Barbara Pavlik, Environmental Protection Specialist <br />From: Bruce Stover, Technical Support <br />Date: January 24, 1994 <br />Re: C-81-018, NOV C-93-156, Compaction Testing Plan, Waste Pile 4: <br />pF'CO~ <br />F~.% <br />~~ p9~ <br />~. <br />~ te]6 ~ <br />Rw Romer <br />Governor <br />ntchael B. Long <br />Divisron Dnecior <br />I have reviewed the materials you gave me on the proposed compaction testing program for the <br />Deserado pile No. 4. There are several parts of the plan which should be clarified or expanded <br />upon so that we are assured of reliable data. My comments are referenced to the items as <br />numbered in the proposed plan: <br />1. In order to have confidence in the test results taken from bulldozed cuts, comparisons <br />of compaction values from the dozed cuts to test pits or drilled holes need to be made. <br />Values for compaction should be taken from test pits excavated to the same depth as the <br />dozed cuts to demonstrate that the weight of the dozer in repeated passes through the <br />pit does not increase the observed compaction through the excavation procedure itself. <br />The least disturbance to the in place materials would occur if a hollow-stem auger hole <br />were drilled, and compaction tests made every two feet. Alternatively, test pits which are <br />carefully excavated with a backhoe or excavator will probably not disturb the in place <br />materials to a significant degree. <br />2. It is not clear how the 10 to 15 foot depth for the test trenches was "determined". As I <br />recall, this figure came up in our meeting with WFU as a suggested acceptable limit for <br />dozer-excavated trenches. Data or records supporting the number of lifts actually placed <br />at the selected test locations should be used to determine the required depths of the test <br />trenches/pits. If this depth is greater than 10 to 15 feet, the test locations should be <br />required to be drilled, or alternatively, excavated by a backhoe or excavator. <br />5. A descriptive log of the test excavations/holes should be made during the compaction <br />testing program. These logs should describe the physical characteristics of each lift-(e.g. <br />color, texture, moisture,)-encountered and tested for verification of depths and location <br />within the pile. <br />7. The accuracy testing results from (1) above should be reviewed by our office prior to <br />commencing full-scale dozer trenching operations. <br />xc: Larry Routten <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.