My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE33162
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE33162
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:47 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:38:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
3/22/1993
Doc Name
DMG RESPONSE TO TDN 93-020-370-001 TV 1 ROADSIDE CAMEO MINE C-81-041
From
US DEPT OF INTERIOR OSM
To
DMG
Violation No.
TD1993020370003TV2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING <br />Reclamation and Enforcement <br />Suite 1200 <br />505 Marquette Avenue N.W. <br />Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 <br />March 18, 1993 <br />Mr. Stephen Renner <br />Coal Program Supervisor <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />iii iiiiiiiuiiu iii <br />999 <br />racE~ <br />.~ ~ <br />~ ^ <br />IN REPLYRF3ER TO. <br />RECEIVED <br />MAR 2 21993 <br />Division 01 fv71i1t~di5 S liCUlOyy <br />Re: Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) Response to Ten-Day-Notice (TDN) <br />93-020-370-001, N 1, Roadside/Cameo Mine, C-81-041 <br />Dear Mr. Renner: <br />The Albuquerque Field Office (AFO) received the Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Notice of Violation (NOV) C-93-009, by telefax on March 15, 1993. A cover letter <br />did not accompany the fax, but Mr. David Berry informed AFO that the NOV was <br />issued in response to the above mentioned TDN. <br />AFO has reviewed NOV C-93-009 and determined that the nature of the violation <br />and the location are the same as those listed on the TDN. The regulation cited in <br />the TDN is also referenced in the NOV. Therefore, AFO finds the NOV to be an <br />appropriate response to the TDN. However, AFO is concerned about the <br />adequacy of the abatement measures. The abatement measures appear to <br />address the submission of certifications in a future tense, while the TDN references <br />the past due certifications. AFO will continue to review this situation during the <br />oversight process. Ii you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact <br />Steve Rathbun or me at (505) 766-1486. <br />Sincerely, <br />Felt H. H; <br />Albuquerque <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.