Laserfiche WebLink
_!^ <br />~ ., <br />III IIIIIIIII IIII III <br />999 ~ <br />United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING ~ 11"I~ <br />RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT ~~ h-~ ~ u " '~ ~ <br />SUITE 310 <br />625 SILVER AVENUE, S. W. eply Re[a To; <br />ALBUQUERQUE, NEW MEXICO 87102 ~~~- 0 5 19~f <br />il~ineN Land <br />July 3, 1991 <br />Reclamation Jiais!trr <br />Permit: 79-60 UG/C <br />Mine Name: Fruita #1 and #2 <br />Mr. Steve Renner, Coal Program Supervisor <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />215 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Renner: <br />'Ihe enclosed Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) <br />inspection report identifies violations that are considered to have <br />existed at the time of the last State complete inspection (LSCI) but had <br />not been citEd. <br />Date of Federal Inspection: 6/4/91 Date of LSCi: 4/8/91 <br />'It~e determination that the State did not cite the violations is based on <br />one or rmre of the following reasons: <br />'lhe condition was identified in a State inspection report but no <br />State enforcement action was taken. <br />_~esign criteria or required certification has not been met for a <br />structure in existence as of the last State conplete inspection <br />(sediment pond, excess spoil fill, etc.). <br />_[`lecessary controls that were required at the time of the last <br />State complete inspection have not been established (diversion <br />ditches, sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and markers, <br />etc.). <br />~_Site corulitions indicate that the violation(s) noted had been in <br />existence at the time of, or prior to, the last State complete <br />inspection. <br />Other (give explanation). <br />*Approved SAE was observed/discussed in the MLRD 4/8/91 inspection <br />report. <br />Seeding deadline ies missed since the LSCI. <br />