My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-06-03_REVISION - M1986015 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1986015
>
2002-06-03_REVISION - M1986015 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:47:37 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:36:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1986015
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/3/2002
Doc Name
Request for extension
From
Southwestern Ecological Services
To
DMG
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Southwestern <br />ECO~OgICd~ <br />Services <br /> <br />Vegetation Analysis <br />Wetland Ecology <br />Land Rehabilitation Planning <br />PhotodocUmentation <br />37 East Colorado Avenue Denver, Colorado 80210-3105 (303) 722-9067 Fax 1303) 778-8937 <br />May 31, zoo2 13ECElVED'/~ <br />Jim Dillie /- JUN 0 3 1Cgtlbvith mail followup <br />DivLsion of Minerals and Geology <br />Room 215 Oiuision of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street p f' P~ ~C~ <br />f'ftAS~ [,`~ 1`1 l 7C <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />RE: Request for extension of consideration for Pueblo East Pit amendment. <br />Permit Number: M-1986-015 <br />~ are-ol; <br />Dear Jim: <br />In behalf of my client, Transit Mix of Pueblo, it is requested that the decision date fox this amendment application <br />be extended by 90 days. It is not likely that much time will acrually be needed. However, in consideration of an <br />objection being filed on the well permit and, if not withdrawn, a hearing being held on that objection sometime in <br />August, it seems pendent to extend for 90 days. We still do not have a fmal date for the actual hearing. Valco and <br />Transit Mix of Pueblo are working with the objector to seek resolution in the near future. The objection is with <br />regard to the parry whose well will be eliminated by the operation, that person being Detta Helmsing. This issue is <br />co"vered by an agreement behveen Ms. Helmsrttg and Valco. The most significant portions of that agreement are <br />contained in Exhibit S of the amendment application. <br />There axe also a few other agreements regarding replacement water fox nearby well owners that need to be fmaiized. <br />Otherwise, al] other matters contained in your adequacy letter of May 6, 2002 have been addressed, although not <br />submitted fox your review. All responses will be provided in a single package rather than in a piecemeal fashion. <br />Thank you for your consideration. If you have any questions, please call. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~~~ <br />Mazk A. Heifhex /`~~ <br />cc:~ ~ Jerry Hermans, Transit Mix <br />- ' Mark' Klune, Transit Mix of Pueblo <br />.Mike Sayler, Bishop-Brogden Associates <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.