ENFORCE32932

• Permit No: M1978305
• IBM Index Class Name: Enforcement
• Doc Date: 1/25/1984
• Doc Name: CHRONOLOGY FORMAZ UNDERSTANDING 78-84
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

-' III IIIIIIIII~III III` ; Chro 0 og
999 Formaz understanding 78 -~ ~,y~~
5 „b M.B"~ flpr ~,Qp~
Late summer 1978 - Formaz first contacted by Bob Campbell ~b~ra 0y y.
115 /~
Sept. 21, 78 - Formaz submitted application and check for $125. orr.,~.~6''~
Oct. 3, 78 Letter from Campbell siting need for 6 additional items
includes statement indicating Formaz had contacted their
local Wildlife Officer. Contact was made by Mr. Formaz.
Oct. 78 - Formaz submitted remaining 5 items requested and never
heard of the matter again.
Conclusion: Formaz thought they had met the requirements of the State.
Sept. 9, 81- Letter from Joe Zalkin advising they were out of compli-
ance and Sited several paragraphs in the Regulations.
Sept. 9 - 21 Telephone call to Joe discovered the material sent by
Formaz was missing from the file and there was no record
of payment of filing fee($125). Joe suggested buying Regs.
Sept. 21, 81 Formaz resubmitted all information including xerox
copy of the filing fee. They also sent Ck.~6 2271 for
$2 for a copy of the Regulations. Mrs. Formaz again
tried to contact the Wildlife Officer, but then decided
to wait for the Regulations to know what she needed.
Sept. 21 81 to Nov. 29, 1983- The Regulations were never recieved nor
Formaz never heard another word.
Conclusion: Formaz thought they had met the requirements and thought
the wildlife report had been submitted. The; still never
realized a Permit would be issued and was unaware of
bonding requirements.
Nov. 29, 1983 Letter from Mark Loye advising they were out of
compliance again siting paragraphs in the Regulations.
Dec. 1, 83 Mr. Formaz immediately called Mark and the entire history
was reviewed. Mark advised them to order a copy of the
regulations and to out-line by letter what had taken place.
This was the first time Formaz learned of mapping require-
ments or of a surity bond. (Formaz has never been asked
to post a bond in any of their contract work).
Dec. 2, 83- Mrs. Formaz wrote a detailed letter of their understand-
ing and enclosed Check ~/ 1191 for $2 for Regulations. Even
• to this date the check has not been returned or Regulations
recieved although Mark saw the check and the Certified
mail receipt was returned to Mrs. Formaz.(dated Dec. 5th)
Dec. 2 - 15 Formaz understood they really did not need to be present
for the Board Hearing on Dec. 15, 1983, if they followed
the Regulations.
Dec. 15, 83 A Cease & Desist Order was directed to the staff.
Dec. 16, 83 Rapp discussed the Board action with Formaz and agreed
to come to Gunnison.
Dec.17, 83 Formaz saw the Regulations for first time and realized
what a completed application required.
Jan 9, 84 Rapp delivered a completed application to Mark Loye, who
promptly reviewed it and okayed legal notice to paper.
Jan 18, 84 Rapp received an adequacy letter from Rocky. Respons. 1/23/84