Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />1. The pre-road slopes were steeper than 2:1. This condition existed <br />because these areas were resting on a sandstone layer that allowed a <br />steeper natural slope. Area 1, in contrast, is an ancient landslide in a <br />fault zone and rests on top of a layer of shale which provided the slip <br />zone on the hillside. <br />' 2. To reduce these areas to a 2:1 slope would require moving the road to <br />the south. To move the road to the south would require removal of <br />material on the slope above the road. This action would produce 1:1 <br />' slopes up to 45 feet high. We do not believe that producing a 45 Poot <br />high slope at a 1:1 grade above the road would be very stable It <br />would also, In effect, replace the disturbance below the road wlrh a <br />cut above the road that would be essentially impossible to revegetate <br />' and would look far worse than not doing anything to areas 2 and 3. <br />A more gradual, 2:1 grade for the slope above the road couldl be <br />installed, but the steepness of the hillside would not allow a 2:1 slope <br />' to daylight until Lt reached the top oP the mountain. <br />It also should be noted that the material immediately above the <br />road Is primarily a thin layer of soil resting on top of sandstone. To <br />' produce any kind of slope other than what is already there prob:cbly <br />would require extensive blasting of the hillside and a maJor road <br />building effort. <br />' We urge you to reconsider your insistence that the slope below <br />the road be established at 2:1. After considering the information <br />provided In this response and examining the cross-sections, we are <br />sure you will agree that taking a less drastic approach Is well worth <br />consideration before tearing up most of the mountainside. Crass- <br />sections through Areas 2 and 3 have been included Sn this submittal to <br />' ,. substantiate our previous studies and conclusions presented in this <br />Response. <br />3. Although we recognize that simply placing soil on these areas could <br />induce instability, we do not think It will. In a similar situation u~lth <br />the waste pile at the Plkevlew @uarry simply dumping soil over the <br />face of the pile that was at the angle of repose has not resulted in <br />' instability there. After three years the pile has' an excellent <br />vegetation cover resulting from the seeding. Heavily vegetated <br />hillsides, particularly when dominated by sod forming grasses, are rtiore - <br />' stable than the same slope without the vegetation. The root mass of <br />grasses, shrubs, and trees all contribute to the stability of slopes that <br />might otherwise be unstable. <br />' We believe that taking the simple approach of topsoiling and <br />revegetating is preferable to creating a worse visual condition and <br />possibly unstable slopes above the road. In the event instability does <br />t occur, then a different approach would be needed. But we have <br />enough confidence in our proposal that we feel the situation on these <br /> <br />a <br /> <br />