My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE32883
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE32883
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:39 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:32:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/3/1991
Doc Name
TEN DAY NOTICE X-91-02-244-7 TV 1 TWENTYMILE COAL CO
From
MLRD
To
OSM
Violation No.
TD1991020244007TV1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1111111111111111111 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />FA%:303 832-6106 <br />May 3, 1991 <br />Mr. Robert Hagen, Director <br />Albuquerque field Office <br />Office of Surface Mining <br />Reclamation and Enforcement <br />625 Silver Avenue, S.W., Suite 310 <br />Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102 <br />Re: Ten Day Notice X-91-02-244-7 TV 1, Twentymile Coal Company <br />Dear Mr.Hagen: <br />OF ~~(p <br />'~~i ~9O <br />H` ~ O <br />~ ~BY6 ~ <br />Roy Romer. <br />Gavemar <br />Freo R. Banta, <br />Division Director <br />I have reviewed your April 29, 1991 determination regarding our April 12, 1991 <br />response to the above referenced Ten Day Notice. The AFG has determined that <br />our response was arbitrary and capricious, and thus inappropriate. As allowed <br />by 30 CFR 842.11(b)(1)(iii), the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />requests an informal review of the AFO determination by the Depu ty Director, <br />Operations and Technical Services. The basis for our appeal is as follows. <br />The Ten Day Notice as well as the AFO determination, both reference Colorado <br />Rule 2.07.3(4) as the basis for the violation. This rule requires that an <br />applicant provide copies of certain permitting actions to the county <br />courthouse such that public review and participation is promoted. Rule 2.07.3 <br />is specific to permitting actions currently in progress. This requirement <br />mirrors the requirements of 30 CFR 773,13 (a)(2), and is therefore no less <br />effective than the federal requirements. <br />The AFO determination expresses concern that mining and reclamation plans are <br />not available to the public for review throughout the life of the operation. <br />As noted in the MLR response to the ten day notice, this information is, in <br />fact, available to the public during the life of the facility. Colorado <br />Rule 5.02.4(1) requires that copies of all records and information required by <br />the rules be available to the public in the vicinity of the mine site. We <br />interpret this requirement to mean that permit documents (required <br />information) as well as other pertinent records be available to the public. <br />These materials may be kept at either the mine site, county offices or an <br />other easily accessible location in the vicinity of the mine. In this <br />particular case, the permit documents are available to the public at the mine <br />office. Coloraao Rule 5.02.4(1) parallels 30 CFR 840.14(b), and is no less <br />effective than that requirement. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.