My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE32858
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE32858
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:39 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:31:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
TRANSMITTAL OF SUMMARY REPORT THIRD PARTY MONITORING OF BATTLE MTN RESOURCES INC SAN LUIS GOLD MINE
From
DMG
To
BATTLE MTN GOLD CO
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• iii iiiiiiiiiiiu iii • <br />STATE OF <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Nawral Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, ColoraAo 80203 <br />Phone: 13071 866-3567 <br />FAX: (3031 832-8106 <br />Mr. Ken Kluksdahl, Mgr. <br />Battle Mountain Gold Company <br />P.O. Box 310 <br />San Luis, CO 81152 <br />RE: Transmittal of "Summary <br />Mountain Resource Inc.'s <br />October 12-13, 1993" by <br />Dear Mr. Kluksdahl: <br />~" <br />~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Ror Romer <br />Goy-ernnr <br />Ken Salazar <br />Eger uiive Dneaur <br />Mrc hael 8. Lung <br />D it icon Direr br <br />Report: Third Party Monit_o_ri g of Battle <br />San Luis Gold Mine, San I,ui, Colorado, <br />Ann Maest, RCG/Hagler Bailly <br />Transmitted herewith is the Summary Report for the October 12-13, 1993 <br />sampling trig for third party monitoring. This report wa revised in <br />response to questions raised by the Division. A response 1 tter, which <br />is expected from Core Laba, will be forwarded as soo as it is <br />received. <br />The report identifies several problems with Core Labs ana yses of BMG <br />samples. I strongly recommend that BMG evaluate the comet nts made by <br />Dr. Maest in light of work that this lab is currently co ducting for <br />BMG. The violation of holding times is a fairly seriou breach of <br />proper lab procedure, and should have been corrected by hanging the <br />lab procedures after the first breach was discovered. Aspanalysis of <br />samples after the recommended holding times ordinarily resu is in lower <br />values, the Division cannot accept such analyses for urposes of <br />demonstrating compliance with permit standards. Because he analyses <br />in question were not compliance samples, the Division mus accept the <br />results, as given. <br />Following up on Dr. Maest's letter, I am recommending to arry Oehler <br />and Jim Stevens by way of this letter that BMG sample well M-9 every <br />two weeks over the next two months (total of four analyse ), and that <br />samples be analyzed by a lab other than Core Labs, ar~d that the <br />analyses be sent to the Division, along with the labs Quagity Control <br />Report, for Division review and comment. Given the estionable <br />analyses, and the frequency with which the same mistake as made, I <br />believe it is appropriate for BMG to assure the Division t at adequate <br />measures have been taken to assure that nothing has ntered the <br />groundwater in the vicinity of well M-9. BMG should res and to Mr. <br />Oehler regarding this suggestion in the very near fut re with a <br />schedule and a laboratory selection. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.