Laserfiche WebLink
r <br /> <br />SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT JUSTIFICATION <br />NOV C-93-032 <br />Assessment Conference summary <br />NOV C-93-032 was issued by David Berry of the Division on April 6, <br />1993, based on a pond discharge sample he collected on an <br />inspection of February 23, 1993. The NOV was issued based on <br />discharge from the Sanborn Creek Mine dewatering treatment pond. <br />Effluent sampled by Mr. Berry on that date was analyzed by the <br />Department of Health, and a total suspended solids level (TSS) of <br />83 mg/1 was measured. The applicable NPDES effluent limit is 70 <br />mg/1. <br />Mr. Shuey indicated that Sanborn Creek, which the pond discharges <br />directly into, was flowing relatively clear at the time the sample <br />was collected. Mr. Shuey and Mr. Wright estimated an effluent <br />discharge of approximately 60 to 10o gpm, and Mr. Shuey indicated <br />that discolored effluent was visible along the edge of the stream <br />for some distance below its point of entry. Sanborn Creek is not <br />a perennial stream and does not support a fishery. It is tributary <br />to the North Fork of the Gunnison. No flow estimate for Sanborn <br />Creek was made at the time of the discharge sample, and the creek <br />was not sampled. <br />Fact of Violation <br />Mr. Wright did not dispute the TSS analysis which indicated an <br />exceedance of the discharge permit. I find that the NOV was <br />appropriately issued. <br />Civil Penalty Assessment <br />Proposed Penalty Assessment <br />History $ 100.00 <br />Seriousness 1250.00 <br />Fault 1500.00 <br />Good Faith -250.00 <br />Total $2600.00 <br />History <br />The History component was not disputed. <br />Seriousness <br />Evidence demonstrates that a TSS exceedance occurred, but no actual <br />environmental harm was not demonstrated. A potential for siltation <br />of Sanborn Creek appears to have existed based on the description <br />of discolored effluent entering a relatively clear stream, but the <br />potential seriousness is lessened somewhat due to the fact that <br />Sanborn Creek is not a perennial stream. Given the effluent flow <br />