My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE32714
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE32714
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:34 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:28:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1978052
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/15/2001
Doc Name
PREHEARING STATEMENT & ANSWER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />progressive attacks and resulted <br />1973 fill. The present location <br />not factors in the capture of mai <br />associated with the May 5 event. <br /> <br />in the final failure of the nonengineered <br />and configuration of the Bull Seep were <br />n channel flows and the ultimate damage <br />(6) Photographic evidence from January 2001 indicates that a breach of the <br />bank in question pre-dated the May 5, 2001 event and that the earlier <br />breach may have accelerated or further catalyzed the May 5 failure. <br />Lidstone's analysis confirms that natural and progressive bank erosion processes <br />were the principal mechanism of failure on May 5, 2001 and that the failure had <br />absolutely no connection to the present location of the Bull Seep. The DMG's <br />September 14 Notice is therefore unsupported and should be rescinded in its entirety. <br />IV. Relief Sought <br />Based on the information supplied in, and attached to this Prehearing Statement <br />and Answer, the Board should rescind and dismiss the allegations in the July 18 and <br />September 14, 2001 Notices. Where the July 18 Notice is concerned, the Board should <br />also order that DMG and MPC work towards establishing a Bull Seep alignment that is <br />consistent with maintaining the conservation and wildlife habitat values presently <br />contemplated in the Reclamation Plan. <br />DATED this 15th day of October, 2001. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Mobile Premix Concrete, Inc., a Subsidiary of Lafarge <br />North America Inc. <br />~ -~- <br />By J~• u..L <br />Jeffrey W. Schwarz <br />MASSEY SEMENOFF SCHWARZ 8 BAILEY, P.C. <br />1600 Stout Street, Suite 1700 <br />Denver, Colorado 80202 <br />ATTORNEYS FOR MOBILE PREMIX CONCRETE, <br />INC., A SUBSIDIARY OF LAFARGE NORTH <br />AMERICA INC. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.