My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE32632
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE32632
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:32 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:26:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
4/5/1992
Doc Name
TECHNICAL REPORT AND PROPOSAL CYANIDE DETOXIFICATION AT SAN LUIS RESPONSE TO 03-31-92 NOPV PRELIMINA
From
MLRD
To
LARRY D OEHLER
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Battle Mountain <br />NOPV Abatement <br />page 4 <br />Gold <br />Requirements <br />(11) "Critical Path" Project Management Schedule <br />Common methodology and practices may serve more than one abat ment plan <br />task. Multiple tasks may occur simultaneously and may impose significant <br />simultaneous performance burdens on BMG and the Division. Inlorder to <br />recognize potential mutual benefits and to avoid conflicts and delay, BMG <br />should develop, maintain and implement one comprehensive, integrated <br />"critical path" project management schedule for the abatement plan tasks. <br />The project management schedule for the BMG abatement plan to ks may be <br />complicated. Schedule maintenance could be facilitated by th use of <br />project management computer software (ie. ON TARGET, Harvard roject <br />Management, TIME LINE, etc), which could be obtained by BMG a d the <br />Division. This would accommodate efficient electronic exchan a of <br />progress information. The schedule should be formatted as a etailed <br />"critical path" project management schedule. The schedule sh uld be <br />divided into discrete task elements. <br />The description of each discrete abatement task element should include: <br />(a) Methodology and practices to be applied, <br />(b) Risk entailed, <br />(Is it proven technology, methodology perfection, resea ch, etc?) <br />(Is it subject to seasonality, weather, equipment avail bility?) <br />(c) Criticality of the task element, <br />(Consequences of failure or delay for abatement progress) <br />(d) Decision points, <br />(e) Necessary relationship to other plan elements, <br />(Must it occur before or after other specific task elements?) <br />(f) Alternative methodology or practices, <br />(To be substituted if failure or delay encountered) <br />(g) Required elapsed time, <br />(h) Name of the responsible staff member(s) or contractor(s)I, <br />(i) Resources to be committed, <br />(BMG staff, consultants, equipment, lab), <br />(j) Required agency response(s), and <br />(Review and approval, site visit, meeting, permit issuance, etc) <br />(k) Abatement plan deadlines. <br />JP/jP <br />Doc No: 2379E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.