My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE32615
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE32615
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:31 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:25:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981012
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
7/9/1990
From
OSM
To
MLRD
Violation No.
TD1991020370003TV4
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MI.RD also brought up other discussion items: <br />o In regard to AFO's concerns at Newlin Creek and Bacon Mines <br />regarding post mine land use for roads, MI,RD asked what kind of <br />information or evaluation was needed. AFO replied that, when <br />reclamation and postmine land use are addressed in the MRP, any roads <br />to be retained at bond release should also be discussed in the MRP <br />with appropriate documentation provided to support the postmining <br />land use. Thus, no postmine land use change for such roads would <br />have to be separately addressed at the time of a proposed bond <br />release. <br />o MLRD also expressed concern with AFO's delay in issuance of a TDN <br />after a May 31, 1990, joint inspection at the New Elk Mine. AFO <br />agreed that the policy of TDN issuance from the Field Office can <br />result in some delay and that there was an untimely issuance of this <br />TDN in particular. AFO noted that the delay was also attributable to <br />some drawn-out post-inspection phone discussions/information requests <br />between AFO and MI.RD inspectors. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.