My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE32198
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE32198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:20 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:15:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982055
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
1/17/1990
Doc Name
Memo about MID TERM REVIEW
From
MLRD
To
BERHAN KEFFELEW
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 866-3567 <br />Fa x: 303 632-8106 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />OF COQ <br />t~; ~ OQ9 <br />R <br />\'~~ a <br />~nyy.~O' <br />• r876 ~ <br />Roy Romer, <br />Governor <br />DATE: January 17, 1990 <br />T0: Berhan Keffelew <br />FROM: Larry Routten <br />RE: Raton Creek Mid-Term Review <br />Fretl R. Banta, <br />Division Director <br />I have reviewed Sections 2.05.4 and 2.05.6 of the Raton Creek permit <br />application and the Findings Document, regarding reclamation and re vegetation <br />plans. <br />The information pertaining to revegetation plans and success standards appears <br />adequate. <br />My only question regarding the reclamation plan is about the scheduling of <br />reclamation of the refuse pile. On pane 458 of the permit application, it is <br />stated that "The overburden and topsoil will be placed on the refuse as soon <br />as each lift is completed." I believe I read a similar commitment elsewhere <br />as well. The application also indicates that construction of the first lift <br />had been completed prior to January 1988. If this is the case, why has the <br />lower lift not been reclaimed during the past two years? It seems to me that <br />the operator should be required to reclaim the first lift of the pile this <br />summer. <br />3097E/scg <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.