My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE32079
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE32079
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:17 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:13:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
12/19/1997
Doc Name
BEAR COAL CO
From
BEAR COAL
To
DMG
Violation No.
CV1997022
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. David Berry <br />Senior Environmental Protection Specialist <br />December 19, 1997 <br />Page 4 <br />12. How many measurements of the mine inflows were made during 1995 that lead to the <br />constant 18 gpm value for June through December 1995 indicated in your 1995 AHR? <br />Bear -The 18 gpm flow value was measured once or twice during the year. The flow <br />remained constant throughout the yeaz so numerous measurements were not considered <br />necessary. <br />13. In your 1996 AHR, the mine inflows for December 1996 aze noted as zero. Does this <br />indicate that Bear did not treat and discharge any mine inflows or that mine inflows <br />ceased? <br />Beaz -Bear ceased the discharge of mine water in September 1996 after a massive roof <br />fall and floor heave forced the installation of seals immediately inby sixth east. The mine <br />water from second west continued to flow and was consumed by the mine operation. The <br />mine water from third west was appazently contained within the roof fall and floor heave <br />rubble because it did not emerge from the seals inby sixth east before mining ceased at <br />the Bear No. 3 Mine in November 1996. <br />14. MCC's calculations of water discharge through the coal block between the NW Panel <br />sealed sump and the Beaz Mine aze based on the respective mine maps of MCC and Beaz. <br />Can Beaz representatives confirm that Bear did not mine to the south of its prescribed <br />boundary and, on the north side of the Beaz Mine, that mining stopped at the prescribed <br />boundary all as depicted on the maps? <br />Bear -Yes. See B-Seam Progress Map, (Frle #7). Can MCC make the same <br />confirmation? <br />15. Is there historical evidence of water at the Beaz Mine with high electrical conductivity <br />values? What do the Bear AHRs indicate on this subject? <br />Beaz -The water which was discharged by Beaz during 1996 (Outfa11001) had <br />conductivity values which would be expected for water from a coal mine. Conductivity <br />measurements ranged from 3,000 to 4,000 umhos/cm. <br />16. Please describe the ventilation system for the Beaz Mine. Is the Bear Mine now <br />completely sealed? <br />Beaz -See the mine map for the layout of the ventilation system. The Bear No. 3 Mine is <br />now completely sealed (File #7). <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.