My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
_REVISION - M1981302 (101)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
_REVISION - M1981302 (101)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 3:50:56 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:12:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Name
PROPOSED PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE ORDER
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
request is granted on condition that it be submitted to the <br /> Division offices, in writing, by June 13 , 1997. <br /> The Division shall also be a party to the proceedings. <br /> III. ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED <br /> 1 . Whether proposed changes to the berm, which have been <br /> styled as a Technical Revision ("TR") and are not now included in <br /> the Amendment Application, properly constitute part of the <br /> Amendment and should be considered as part of the Amendment? <br /> 2 . Whether the formal public hearing now set for June 26, <br /> 1997 should be continued and reset to include consideration of <br /> the proposed changes to the berm in conjunction with and as part <br /> of the Amendment? <br /> 3 . Whether the Amendment conforms to the stated post-mining <br /> use of wildlife and agriculture? <br /> 4 . Whether the Amendment adequately addresses impacts on <br /> ground water levels and irrigation flows? <br /> 5 . Whether the proposed decrease in exposed water surface <br /> is appropriate to the stated post-mining use of wildlife and <br /> agriculture and to habitat management and creation? <br /> 6 . Whether topsoil replacement as proposed in the Amendment <br /> is sufficient to support the plant species to be established in <br /> reclamation? <br /> (with respect to this issue, a letter dated June 4 , <br /> 1997, from Mineral Program Supervisor Bruce Humphries <br /> to Michael Hart, was distributed and discussed at the <br /> Pre-Hearing Conference. In light of Mr. Hart' s <br /> statement that Western Mobile does not object to the <br /> requirements set forth in this letter, parties will be <br /> allowed until June 13, 1997 to file written position <br /> statements on this issue as it has been affected by Mr. <br /> Humphries' letter and Mr. Hart' s statement . If it <br /> appears that sufficiency of topsoil replacement is no <br /> longer an issue, it will be removed from consideration <br /> at the formal public hearing. ] <br /> IV. WITNESSES AND EXHIBITS <br /> Witnesses and exhibits shall be permitted as described in <br /> the Board' s Pre-Hearing Order of May 21, 1997 . <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.