Laserfiche WebLink
N_~~-~,lauo <br />hearing on the possible violations be schedul d so as to follow <br />the hearing on permit amendment application is denied. <br />The Board shall hold a hearing in this matter concerning possible <br />violations prior to continuing the hearing concerning the permit <br />amendment. <br />5. The motion by Castle Concrete Company to continue <br />this matter concerning the possible violations beyond the August <br />1989 Board Meeting is denied. The hearing on possible violations <br />shall be held at the August 1989 meeting as scheduled. <br />6. PROCEDURE <br />The following order of presentation shall govern the hear- <br />ing, The Board has the right to limit any redundant or repeti- <br />tive testimony. <br />a. Presentation of evidence by the Division, fol- <br />lowed by: <br />1) Cross-examination of Division witnesses <br />by Castle Concrete; <br />2) Cross-examination of Division witnesses <br />by the parties in the order listed in paragraph 1. <br />followed by: <br />b. Presentation of evidence by Castle Concrete, <br />1) Cross-examination by the Division; <br />2) Cross-examination by each of the parties <br />in the order listed in paragraph 1. <br />c. Presentation of evidence by the parties in the <br />order listed in paragraph 1; each party's presentation shall be <br />followed by: <br />1) Cross-examination by the Division; <br />2) Cross-examination by Castle Concrete. <br />d. Rebuttal evidence by Castle Concrete; <br />e. Rebuttal evidence by the Division; <br />f. Closing arguments in the following order: <br />-2- <br />