My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE31940
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE31940
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:43:14 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:09:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
11/16/1990
Doc Name
Memo on NOVs & Request for Vacation
From
MLRD
To
DAN MATHEWS FRED BANTA
Violation No.
CV1990045
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLURAllU <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman S(.. Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />303 8663567 <br />FA X: 303 832-8706 <br />DATE: November 16, 1990 <br />T0: Dan Mathews <br />Fred Banta <br />FROM: Tony Waldron i <br />pF Cpl pp <br />e~i~'O <br />H ~ `~ <br />~~s3/~. <br />a <br />~ 18'16 ~ <br />Roy Romer, <br />Governor <br />Fred R. Banta, <br />Division Direr~or <br />RE: H-G Coal Company (C-84-003) Notices of Violation C-90-042 and C-90-045 <br />H-G Coal Company has requested vacation of NOVs C-90-042 and C-90-045. <br />Following is additional information concerning the violations. <br />On September 27, 1990 a complete inspection was conducted at the H-G Mine. <br />During the course of the inspection two violations were discovered. C-90-042 <br />was issued for failure to clearly mark the perimeter of the permit area. <br />Specifically there is an area of land in the middle of the H-G load-out which <br />is not in the permit area but is completely surrounded by permit area. This <br />area was not marked at the site. The perimeter of the loadout is completely <br />fenced, however, it does not say that the fence will serve as the permit <br />boundary marker in the permit application and it is not specially marked (i.e. <br />signs, colored posts, plastic caps, etc.). Therefore, even though it may seem <br />obvious that it is the permit boundary it is not clearly identified as such <br />and the interior portion was definitely not marked. <br />NOV C-90-045 was issued for failure to maintain a culvert which was almost <br />completely clogged at the outlet. I have attached a memo which was written to <br />Jim Stevens for use in assessing the NOV which explains the violation. <br />If you have any questions, or require additional information, please see me. <br />1518E/scg <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.