My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-05-22_REVISION - M1977436
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1977436
>
2002-05-22_REVISION - M1977436
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 5:33:27 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:06:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1977436
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
5/22/2002
Doc Name
Adequacy Questions
From
DMG
To
Aggregate Industries - WCR Inc
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
3. Letter from Eric Odel of the Colorado Division of Wildlife dated Apri15, 2002. <br />a) We feel that slopes that aze 3:1 aze too steep to provide much benefit to wildlife habitat. Instead, we <br />encourage much shallower slopes, on the range of 10:1. Creating an undulating shoreline will inherently <br />add diversity to the constructed habitat, which is a beneficial aspect. Creating shallow water habitat far <br />into the reclaimed pond is also beneficial. This will create habitat for aquatic insects, which in turn will <br />attract a different community of migrating wildlife to the area. This shallow water azea should extend <br />approximately 25 feet into the pond form the shoreline. Building small islands in the pond will create <br />refuge for a variety of wildlife, as well. <br />4. Aggregate Industries states that 4 feet of the berm will be removed to facilitate floodwaters to enter and leave the <br />pit. Please provide a more detailed reclamation plan map that depicts the elevation of the bottom of the pit, the <br />elevation of the riverside berm and the elevation of the spillway in relation to the South Platte River. <br />5. The operator states that wash fines pumped from the aggregate processing operation into the North Lake will be <br />used to construct the wetlands. Please explain the time frame in which [he azea will be reclaimed to a wetland <br />habitat. Specifically, when the spillway will be constructed, when the azea will be backfilled and graded and when <br />the site will be revegetated with the proposed wetland seed mixture. <br />6. Aggregate Industries proposes 18" grouted boulders along the pitside of the channel spillways. In accordance with <br />the Technical Review Guidelines for Gravel Mining- Urban Drainage and Flood Control District ("Guidelines"), <br />the grout must have a minimum compressive strength of 2,000 psi. As an alternative, a concrete mix having 3/a- <br />inch maximum aggregate, 4-inch slump and 2,000 psi- 28-day compressive strength may be substituted for grout. <br />In addition, the grout shall be placed in a manner that ensures that all voids within the riprap are filled with grout. <br />Please commit to such specifications, or provide an al[emative method. <br />7. In the Permit Amendment Application approved by the Division on November 16, 2000, Aggregate Industries <br />states that the operator will avoid disturbing potential Uteiadies-tresses orchid habitat and mining within 300 feet <br />of [he potential Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse habitat, until the referenced disqualification's and/or trapping <br />studies aze performed. Please inform the Division as to the status of this study and how mining within 100 feet or <br />200 feet of the South Platte River will impact the Preble's Meadow Jumping Mouse habit and the 300-foot mining <br />offset distance. <br />8. Aggregate Industries proposes four rundown channels from various drainages that will capture runoff into the pits. <br />Please explain how these channels aze to function in regazd to the water storage reservoirs. Specifically, does <br />Aggregate Industries have the water rights associated with this capture? How will the water exit the pit, and are <br />the spillways designed for such flows? When will such structures be constructed? If cannel spillways aze not <br />constructed (i.e. mining off set distance of 400 feet), how will the rundown water leave the reservoirs? How will <br />existing man made stmctures be impacted by the construction of the rundown channels? Please provide a basis for <br />the various flow rates established for each drainage. <br />Please respond to these items prior to June 20, 2002. )f you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me at <br />303-866-4943. <br />.A, <br />Si erely, <br />a Crosby <br />Environmental Protectio cialist <br />Enclosure(s) <br />cc: Cazl Mount; DMG (via electronic mail) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.