Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, SAN LUIS PROJECT <br />CMLRD ADEQUACY LETTER RESPONSES <br />Page 16 of 28 <br />In terms of the limit equilibrium principles employed in pseudostatic <br />analyses, if a seismic event of sufficient magnitude to cause the <br />factor of safety to drop below unity were to occur, this signifies <br />that some failure will occur. No quantification of the degree of <br />failure is produced, under actual seismic excitation, the direction <br />of the induced forces vary rapidly creating short periods when the <br />structure is unstable followed by periods when the forces reverse, <br />thereby increasing stability. Depending upon the duration of the <br />unstable condition a section of the embankment will slide along the <br />failure surface and will come to rest when the new mean stresses <br />along the failure surface do not exceed the available strength. The <br />amount of relative displacement of the failed mass wi'Il depend on <br />the duration for which the stresses exceed the available strength. <br />Under static conditions the stresses which cause failure will exist <br />until large displacements change the geometry of the structure <br />thereby changing the stress conditions. Under earthquake conditions <br />the stresses causing displacement will exist only for a short time <br />and the factor of safety after the earthquake will be the same as <br />that prior to the earthquake provided that the displacements are not <br />sufficiently large to alter the configuration of the embankment <br />considerably. <br />Considering the slopes and materials of the San Luis tailings <br />embankment, a seismic event of sufficient magnitude to result in a <br />displacement large enough to cause loss of the operational freeboard <br />' (5 feet minimum) and subsequent escape of tailings or solution is <br />not predicted to occur. As indicated by the sensitivity analyses, <br />a pseudostatic coefficient of 0.259 does not cause the factor of <br />' safety to drop below unity when utilizing conservative embankment <br />shear strength parameters. A pseudostatic coefficient of 0.259 <br />roughly corresponds to a peak ground acceleration of Oi.6g or that <br />equivalent to the MCE for the project area. <br /> <br />f <br /> <br />i <br /> <br />Should seismic induced displacements and slope adjustments cause the <br />pipe network beneath the embankment to become inoperable, the <br />drainage blanket has sufficient capacity to pass all drainage from <br />the tailings facility. The embankment will remain unsaturated. Should <br />minor displacement of the embankment occur during operation, the <br />failure is indicated to occur along the synthetic liner to embankment <br />interface. Damage to the synthetic liner may result, however, the <br />compacted subsoil can be anticipated to retain its integrity. Repair <br />of the liner and rehabilitation of the embankment slopes could be <br />performed without significantly impacting continued operation of the <br />facility. <br />The rate of seepage and its predicted quality are such that little <br />impact on groundwater would exist in the unlikely event that seismic <br />induced failure occurred (see response to Question 11). <br />IJ <br />