My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-01-10_REVISION - M1988112
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1998-01-10_REVISION - M1988112
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/21/2021 10:19:26 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 1:03:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/10/1998
Doc Name
SAN LUIS PROJECT PERMIT AMENDMENT ADEQUACY RESPONSES M-88-112
From
STEFFEN ROBERTSON & KIRSTEN
To
MLRD
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
100
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />I <br />1 <br />BATTLE MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, SAN LUIS PROJECT <br />CMLRD ADEQUACY LETTER RESPONSES <br />Page 14 of 28 <br />A review of seismic records of the past 110 years show that seismic <br />activity in the San Luis Valley has been virtually absent. A review <br />of technical literature pertaining to seismicity in the project <br />vicinity, however, revealed that Kirkham and Rogers (1981) in their <br />study of Colorado Earthquake potential, identified the Sangre de <br />Cristo Fault, which trends north-south at the base of the foothills <br />to the west of the project site. This fault is located relative to <br />the project on Figure D.1-1 in the April 1989 submission to the <br />Colorado MLRD. The interpretation of the fault was that it should <br />be classified as an active fault based on its apparent rupture having <br />occurred within the last 10,000 years (Holocene). <br />To augment the regional study, SRK commissioned Dr. Charles Glass <br />to further evaluate the seismic potential of this fault. Copies of <br />Dr. Glass' reports are contained in Appendix B of the April 1989 <br />submission. Dr. Glass' findings indicated that the maximum credible <br />earthquake (MCE) for the portion of the Sangre de Cristo Fault in <br />the project vicinity is a Richter Magnitude of 6.8 to ~.0 and that <br />a very conservative and somewhat tentative estimate of the <br />probability of its occurrence in the next 100 yrs ranges from 0.6 <br />to 12 percent. This equates to a probability of .06 to 1.3 percent <br />that the MCE will occur in the next 10 yrs or the operational life <br />of the facility. However, statistical models used to predict the <br />recurrence interval of earthquakes require a relatively complete <br />catalogue of historical seismicity. There is virtually no historical <br />seismicity for the San Luis Valley over the past 110 years. Dr. <br />Glass estimates that there is a 25 percent chance that the MCE along <br />this fault has a recurrence interval less than 10,000 years and <br />agrees with Kirkham and Rogers estimate that the Sangre de Cristo <br />fault last exhibited movement 1,940 to 4,715 years ago. <br />Current seismic theory suggests that the build-up of stresses along <br />' a large fault occurs prior to release of those stresses through a <br />major seismic event. Increase in stress is indicated by the <br />occurrence of minor seismic activity as the stress builds. The lack <br />' of seismic activity in the San Luis Valley indicates that stresses <br />across the Sangre de Cristo Fault have not been increasing and that <br />the occurrence of a major seismic event along this fault in the near <br />future is doubtful. Due to the indicated low probability of the <br />occurrence of the MCE event, SRK determined that the seismic design <br />criteria for the tailings facility should be based on the potential <br />for regional seismic activity. <br />' As indicated in Section D.1.2 of the approved permit application, <br />Algermissen et al (1982) suggest a peak ground acceleration for the <br />' project area of 0.139. This acceleration has an associated 90 percent <br />probability of not being exceeded in 250 years. To utiliae this data <br />fora pseudostatic analysis the peak ground acceleration is reduced <br />to produce an equivalent acceleration. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.