Laserfiche WebLink
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />731: Sherman SL, Room 215 C O L O RA D O <br />Dem~er, Colorado 80203 DIVISION O F <br />Phore: (303) 866-3567 M I l~l & A L $ <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 G E O L O G Y <br />' - REC L~NRTION•NINING <br /> SAFETY•SQ ENCE <br /> Bill Owens <br />DATE: January 28, 2~~5 Governor <br /> Russell George <br />T0: Steve Shuey Executive Director <br /> Ronald W. Cattany <br /> <br />FROM: <br />Allen Sorenson Division Director <br />Natal Resource rrGStee <br />RE: Review of As-Built Drawings, Stage Ilnlet/Outlet Channels, Whitewater Building <br />Materials Corporation, Whitewater Pit 500, Permit No. M-1977-129 <br />The Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG) engineering staff has reviewed the design drawings <br />approved in technical revision TR-02 for the inlet and outlet channels• in the stage I pond perimeter and <br />the as-built drawings for these channels that were subsequently provided by the Operator..The purpose. . <br />of these channels is to allow flow from the adjacent Gunnison Riber.into and out of the pond during <br />high stream flows. The drawings designate these channels as U/S notch-for the upstream channel and <br />D/S notch for the downstream channel. <br />Based on the review of the drawings, DMG has determined that the channels were constructed in <br />general accordance with the approved plans and that the channels will function in accordance with the <br />intent of the design. The as-builts show some variances from the design plans. For example, the side <br />slopes of the notches were built at slopes much flatter than the 2.5:1 (typ.) slopes shown on the design <br />drawings, but this will actually result in greater channel stability. Also the channel bottom widths are <br />narrower than shown in the design, but because the channel side slopes are flatter the cross sectional <br />areas aze about the same and flow capacity will not be much diminished. Finally, the D/S notch invert <br />was constructed 1.25 feet higher than shown in the drawings; this will not appreciably impact the <br />operation of the channels or pond. <br />The only problem identified on the as-built drawings is a typographical error on drawing C-1 as-built, <br />where notch D/S is inadvertently labeled as notch U/S. <br />c;c: Carl Mount, DMG (via email) <br />c:`acs\LOANER MACHINEWiy Documents\whitewater as builts.doc <br />Office of Office of Colorado <br />