ENFORCE31469

• Permit No: C1981019
• IBM Index Class Name: Enforcement
• Doc Date: 11/20/1992
• Doc Name: MEMO COLOWYO COAL CO C-81-019 UPDATE ON CONCERNS
• From: DMG
• To: LARRY ROUTTEN
• Violation No.: CV1992030
• Media Type: D
• Archive: No

• ~ III IIII IIIIIIIII III
DIVISION Of MINERALS AND GEOLOGY ~~

Depanmem of Natural Resources ~
. ~ ~~'o
r
``
T- ,c.
~
7 713 Sherman SL, Room ?1 5 \, ~~~~;'r~'7
Denver, CO 80207 \~ rb]5 • `
Phone: [phone]:
FAX: 13031 A32-A106 \nr 2un:er
~.?~rrrnar
DATE: November 20 1992
r t~iihael B. Lone
Divomn Direaar
TO: Larry Routten
FROM: Stephen Wathea~
RE: Colowyo Coal Mine; C-81-019
Update oa Conceras
~F
NOV - Blastiaa Sketches (NOV issued 10-22-92)
~e~ry.
MR - 22 (Incomplete issued 11-13-92)
Where do we stand on re est for vacation of NOV? p .~J
LArc-y 5:(6;n~}lec/ ~ef~Cf {o rn~(~=? ~.~Iq Grv. IO-l~l~ -/~.r /~1e•P2 ~S '~/o
c~e4(~ I I~Ne oN ~i f<e S v`eS (°c•.~se, J
where do we stand on determining amount of penalty? (NOV file given to Dave Berry
on 11-20-92)
~(>osC cl ~nw't-'v~{ o~ c~~',I PcNCI I-~~ -SC~vt' ~/-2v-y2 6 ~ctv C'
,r
Where do we stand on what is needed to clear up blasting NOV? (Reference Carl
Mount's memo of 11-17-92) c
.Larry w;11 .~ev,cw •i-his. JSi~1 Se.vt C.c.vc~z,N o.~e•/` -~-; MrNa{-c~„J o,~v
~I-(~-92, ~0~1 sc-ArF -Iolr.,/c o eN ~I-?y-•9 Z,
Where do we stand on Colowyo's equest to continue hydrology modeling for the
Prospect Pond? (Original finalization date 8-31-92; request to extend until 12-31-
92) (Modeling submission promised on 11-17-92; not arrived)
SU,~/J SAIO THRr N~ m15SED (1-17-y? DEIteLrNE, z~~2~TY SAID' 7rA•r.T SFl'=uc-~ SENa
(~E(-~~i2 7p 3-uAN j~CAA inC ONC tn:cEK FaQ su~3,n rT-rHL pR ~ llrllF Cti~ecEn+EvT.
Where do we stand on writing an NOV to Colowyo for lack of response to our requests
for modeling information and Prospect Ditch and Prospect Pond "as-builts"? (Letter
from Division dated 10-6-92; Inspection 9-29-92) r
?ilFl~ 1~c-D MC a~ (I-20-y2 '(7+A-C ~,~1FT w.9spe~~~ w.~ i-%nrNL AsfiP,
where do •~re stand on pages promised from Colowyo to clarify fill reports?
C,jzp...~yos Ci.esT f~P0.R7-(0.'~ 31r tP°'wG 7a PSOi~ 1}~LO PRF~.?~~rwo• 7~C~zoOKS
4>r.1Pt,c'i~, QuArtr&~~~ l~/°i32T Dur MiD ~,9nrufEa.y, rf}~ iQtUrElti,roi.- CtJ~aWYO ME/~1C
Where do we stand on adequacy of Colowyo Fill Reports on Section 16 Fill?
C.~f.cv~y' 'V ~OS is SEND ~Li ~t-1'c;C-r aN J_aiJtLO~iY~~ UNJ~'72 D,2~,v ?+-ic~ w~/c:f
(}~fE12 St~n(vG- 4~.'JS ~2~CTw N F1rvc ~t.'~-32Y Z w~~lS Tf+F~ffFT~fl.
TIC`'( KIGER S~nr7" /~/tS~G r~F,k:--ES 7~ S?77sfy /Y!R-Z?~ P/~-CC's -lo
Sn4rF ~T F l ~-~- REi°aRn W / ~ ~ B~ sE-i/~ 7o V /~)~- a,N o.~ G-o HIV G ~ASi~
P A (-ES ~.E C t tti EJ c;v 1 I - Za - `1 ~
(> u C%^