Laserfiche WebLink
irispectton ahd the fagts or vtdence'supportirig'Ytje, ,, foicemenf act[on. `:'- - <br />- .. ',:. <br />.> n~. ~ .`:'.,ter. ;l^: 4' .. ~ ~3. .~,. <br />~At CRDA- I ,refuse has~een spread and graded on pottions of the working..bench, with truck <br />dumped piles recently deposited on other areas. Although no[ final graded, Terrace Drain #4 has <br />been "[rouehed in~• olon~~ its entire length. Lower terrace drains and bench outslopes were well <br />maintained arnl n~+ pn+hlrnu weic apparent <br />No problems ~~cre observed xt the RSRDA. Operator indicated that Lower Catch Ditch #2 <br />would be re~'raded as ~pecitied in NOV 97-016 Abatement Item #5. Various locations along the <br />South Diversion ~~hirh had bCCn cited in the NOV were viewed in response [o the operator's <br />contention that the Uicisiun had assumed inappropriate vegetation cover class in recent ditch <br />design reviews. \>,-bile ~,tround cover percentage appeared [o be consistent with Division <br />assumptions (40-60': ~~), it was noted that cover was provided almost exclusively by low growing, <br />shallow rooted annual species: primarily cheatgrass and Russian thistle. The Division will <br />consider this I;tcwr in reevaluation utthe ditch designs. <br />Reveaetauon!\\ ildlil: <br />As noted in prey usu. inspections. north Decline areas ripped and reseeded in the fall of 1996 <br />were JununateJ ihi~ _ m~~ in~~ >r.unn b~ chea[~!rass and annual ~i'eedy species. as is typical for a <br />firs[ czar sr. Dine I k~ elupmrni of the sand will be evaluated over the next several growing <br />seasons. Dyer ^nJ rll, ,i,~n ~+as abundant in the North Decline area. Chukar partridge are <br />frequently ohsri ~ ed ~n the Nonh Decline area and CRDA-2 reclaimed areas. <br />. - ~ ;::~! <br />.' `'. i~ i <br />-:. <br />