My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE31275
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE31275
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:42:58 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:55:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Name
EXPLANATION OF PROPOSED PENALTY FOR NOV C-90-045
Violation No.
CV1990045
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
IIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />COAL PROGRAM <br />Explanation of Proposed Penalty for NOV C-90-045 <br />History <br />History Although the operator has been issued one (11 NOV in the <br />preceding 12 month period, that NOV has not completed administrative <br />review. Asa result there is no assessment for history. <br />B. Seriousness The failure to properly maintain the culvert did not <br />resul~in rrecognizable onsite or offsite environmental harm or property <br />damage. There was, however, potential created by the partial plugging <br />for overflow of the access road and/or adjacent county road, erosion of <br />the road, and creation of a safety hazard to drivers on the road. <br />There was some capacity remaining in the culvert, but since the <br />operator did not apparently recognize the culvert as his responsibility <br />to maintain, the potential for overflow etc. is considered at least <br />low. Assessment for seriousness is therefore set at 5250.00. <br />Fault At the time of inspection, the operator suggested that the <br />county was responsible for maintenance of the culvert. A call by MLRD <br />to the Routt County Road Department as well as a check of the permit <br />application package established that the operator had responsibility. <br />The operator should have been aware of his maintenance obligation and <br />is considered negligent for not so being. The degree of negligence is <br />considered low. Only one culvert was involved and it is situated at a <br />location where maintenance responsibility could be in doubt. As a <br />result, assessment for fault is set at 5250.00. <br />D. Days The penalty is assessed for one day. <br />Good Faith The violation has not been terminated as a result of MLRD <br />inspection. No reduction for good faith is proposed. <br />JCS/yjb <br />1576E <br />Name Printed <br />cc: Michael Savage <br />Doc No. 4672E <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.