Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />' COMMENT BY JAMES STE'JENS <br />' 1. Consideration should be given to ndding samples of the leak detection system to <br />the bi-weekly sampling program. 77ris funs previously done on q monthly basis, <br /> but with the increase in cyanide levels in dre pond, a higher sampling frequency <br /> seenu reasonable. <br /> RESPONSE: Given the extremely low levels of flow reporting to the leak d@tection system, <br />' there is no basis for a higher sampling frequency. <br /> 2. Well M-2 is listed for bot/t bi-weekly and quatterly santplittg peripd. It should be <br />' removed from the quarterly list. <br /> RESPONSE: It is proposed that well M-2 be sampling on a bi-weekly basis; however, it is also <br /> included during the quarterly sampling of all surface water and ground water <br />' monitoring points. BMR believes that the sample list should reirlain as shown in <br /> the protocol document (see Response to Harry Posey's Commant No. 4 in the <br />' "Page-by-Page Comments" section). <br />3. As a reasonable extra precaution to increase dte accuracy of sagrple results and <br />' eliminate any possible effects of corttnnrination by equipntend, the sampling <br />sequence should be front those monitoring points historically ha.vdng lower values <br />' of cyanide to those having higher levels. <br />RESPONSE: Please see Section 2.2.8 of the Protocol Document (First paragraph at the top of <br />' Page 15), which proposes this exact protocol. <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br />~~ <br /> <br />' -15- <br />1 <br /> <br />