Laserfiche WebLink
Rule 5.03.2(2)(e) provides for the Company to request an extension to the period of <br />abatement. The Company submitted such a request on 26 September 2005. <br />Rule 5.03.2(2)(e) requires the concurrence of the extension of time for abatement by the <br />Administrator. Concurrence is demonstrated in the attached memorandum of David A. Berry. <br />Rule 5.03.2(2)(e) requires that the extension of time for abatement be the shortest time <br />necessary to abate the violation. A mandatory 10-day public notice period follows publication of <br />the notice of a proposed decision in a local newspaper. Publication of a notice usually takes a <br />week following submittal. Thus final approval of TR-50 may not be achieved until December 8, <br />2005. An allowance of time for construction and validation inspection places a determination of <br />abatement azound 5 January 2006. Some economy of time may be achieved. A week is provided <br />in the schedule for variances in dates of publication (beyond the control of the Company or the <br />Division). The requested extension of the period of abatement to 5 January 2006 does not <br />consume all the time permitted to process a technical revision, and is considered the shortest time <br />necessary to abate the violation. It does consume the entire 90 days of an extension as permitted <br />under this rule. <br />Rule 5.03.2(2)(e) requires the concurrence, with reasons, of the authorized representative's <br />immediate supervisor. Concurrence, with reasons, is demonstrated in the attached memorandum <br />of Daniel I. Hernandez. <br />Rule 5.03.2(2)(g) limits extensions to the period of abatement to 90 days. This proposed <br />extension to the period of abatement is 90 days. <br />I therefore respectfully request your signature on the attached NOV extension form. <br />3 Enclosures as stated <br />files: C-1981-056 CV 2005-005 <br />4 August 2005, page3 of 3 pages, R. W. Cattany <br />