My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE31165
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE31165
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:42:55 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:53:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981015
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
2/16/1994
Doc Name
FAX COVER TEN DAY NOTICE 91-02-116-05 FRUITA 1 AND 2 MINES AMERICAN SHIELD COAL CO
From
OSM
To
DMG
Violation No.
TD1991020116005TV3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~4 16:09 $505 7682609 OSN ALBUO FO a.. CO/DMG ~ 002/002 <br />t <br />Mr. Michael B. Long 2 <br />procedures if a FTACO remains unabated for more than 30 days. However, <br />Mr. Steven G. Renner, Coal Program Supervisor, has recently informed AFO that <br />DMG will not be pursuing alternative enforcement but, instead, will request the <br />Colorado Board to order the operator's bond be forfeked. <br />Both AFO and DMG have agreed that the current bond of $36,000 is insufficient to <br />reclaim the Fruita minesite to the required standards of the Colorado program as <br />required by the Deputy Directors decision of August 16, 1991. Pursuit of the <br />alternative enforcement provisions of Colorado's Program could, however, compel <br />performance by the operator to return the site to ks approximate original contour. <br />Therefore, until all available avenues have been pursued, forfekure of an <br />insufficient bond alone would be considered to be inadequate to cause the violation <br />to be corrected and to be an inappropriate action by DMG. <br />Alternative enforcement, as found in Colorado's program, consists of the following: <br />Individual Civil Penakies (Section 343-123(10)); Injunctive Relief (Section 34-33- <br />123(12)); Criminal Penakies (Section 34-33-123(9)); and Permit <br />Suspension/Revocation (Section 34-33-123(7)). Pernik Suspension/Revocation is <br />not a viable option in this instance in that a permanent program permk was never <br />issued for Fruka and a pattern of violations has not been found. <br />AFO's follow-up inspection of the Fruita minesite has been held in abeyance since <br />September 24, 1991, on the premise that DMG's NOV would cause the violation to <br />be corrected. The final phase of the process to compel compliance to a NOV is <br />the alternative enforcement provisions discussed above. Therefore, AFO requests <br />that DMG inform this office within five days of receipt of this correspondence of the <br />akemative enforcement procedures DMG will be pursuing and the schedule of their <br />implementation in order for OSM to determine if further Federal action is <br />necessary. <br />If you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel free to contact me at <br />(505) 766-1486. <br />Sincerely, <br />~. <br />Robert H. g Director <br />Albuquerq field Office <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.