Laserfiche WebLink
Snell & Wilmer <br />LL.P <br />Mr. Mike Long <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street, Suite 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />December 29, 2000 <br />Page 4 <br />environment, the DMG must provide 90 days to abate the alleged violation as it is the only ~ <br />"reasonable period." <br />I V. <br />ANY EFFORT TO FIND POWDERHORN IN VIOLATION OR TO <br />FORECLOSE ITS BOND WOULD BE INEQUITABLE AS POWDERHORN <br />IS NOT CONDUCTING COAL MINING OPERATIONS AND IS <br />PROCEEDING WITH ACTIVITIES NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT ITS <br />RECLAMATION PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE LAW <br />Powderhom understands how Frontier's current status creates a difficult situation from <br />the State's perspective. However, should [he State determine that Frontier's status creates an <br />unabated violation by Powderhom, it will have unfair and probably unintended consequences to <br />both Powderhor and Quaker, which could affect the bankruptcy reorganization, and possibly the <br />ability of [he company [o carry out the reclamation plan. An unabated violation could result in a <br />permit block against Quaker and its subsidiaries under the Applicant Violator System. Yet, there <br />is very little risk to the State and the public in allowing Powderhom a reasonable period of time <br />to seek to obtain replacement coverage, if it is determined to be required by the State. / <br />Even were the State inclined to seek foreclose of the Bond, State law identifies limited <br />circumstances under which DMG may iake such drastic measures. In particular, the regulations <br />state that a Bond may be forfeited when the "permittee has violated any of the terms or <br />conditions of the bond and has failed to take adequate corrective action." 2 CCR 407-2, <br />3.04.1(1)(a) (emphasis added). Here, Powderhom has violated no term or condition of its Bond. <br />Rather, the Stale is directly imputing a violation as a result of the status of Frontier, despite the ~ <br />fact that Frontier has not been found incapable of meeting its surety obligations. <br />The regulation also provides the permittee the opportunity to take corrective action. The <br />30 day period provided by the State to abate the NOV is too short a timefranre to reasonably <br />expect Powderhom to be able to take corrective action. The bankruptcy creditor's committee <br />and the inactive status of the mine make it difficult to find a surety willing to provide a bond. <br />DMG may not foreclose the bond until it can be shown that Powderhom has "failed to take ~ <br />adequate corrective action" and a reasonable amount of time has passed. <br />Finally, Powderhom continues to work diligently with the State in finalizing its <br />reclamation plan for implementation. The onset of litigation and attention that could result from <br />an enforcement or Bond forfeiture proceeding can only serve to delay implementation of on-the- , <br />ground reclamation. <br />6J3~.1 <br />