Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Suzanne JanZen <br />March 11;1005 <br />Page 3 of ~. <br />after reclamation.will be less than +/- 1 foot as cpmpazed to <br />:will commit to monitoring groundwater elevatipns in-the vi <br />years- following completion of reclamation.. If the monitor <br />frpm hisforio levels (based on ongoing monitoring by Laf <br />;feet, coupled with physical injury to .a structure Lafarge <br />,appropriate structure to collect up-gradient groundwater an <br />side.of each slurry wall or clay liner. Our previous experie <br />means pf alleviating" mounding and shadowing effects surrou <br />We. npte that Colorado- water law. generally does not reco~ <br />guaranteed water level in his well: If a well that is impactei <br />is neither drilled 'to the full extent of .the alluvium nor ha <br />possible elevation, the owner of the well likely cannot makE <br />right (see Colorado Springs v. Bender; 366 P:2d 552 at 555 <br />'injury to vested water rights will be.the subject of State E <br />applicaton submitted pursuant to C.R.S. §37-90-137(2) f <br />Lafarge recognizes that its operation may modify the flow o <br />extent that modifications adverse to existing' structures oc <br />operation and. subsequent reclamation of the site Lafazg <br />monitoring and mitigation. <br />21. The applicant must comply with. Rule 6.4.7(4), whici <br />projected 'amount. from each of the sources of i <br />requirements far the mining operation and reclamati~ <br />During mining, Lafazge will utilize leases from the City of <br />Water Company for replacement of mining depletions. La <br />which provide 43.9 acre-feet of historic consumptive use <br />eommi4ted to the combined substitute supply plan for Lafa <br />which includes the Riverbend; Operation and'the-.Fort Lu <br />.Brighton Ditch shazes. Lafazge will' complete a historic a <br />-shazes in.order to include them as.a replacement source.. <br />substitute supply plan for the South Platte sites. The farm <br />Ditch shares is approximately '821 acre-feet. The leases <br />.substitute supply plan will replace all out-of-priority depletic <br />pumping depletions until all the sites are either lined c <br />augmentation is obtained :from water court.' ; <br />22: The SWSP approval letter dated April 2, 2001, submii <br />Lupton Gravel Pit (M--1985-088) portion of the amen <br />`31, 2003: The applicant must demonstrate current <br />for this exposed groundwater surface. <br />;xisting conditions. Again, Lafazge <br />inity of the site for a peripd of two <br />ng shows a change in; water levels <br />•ge prior to mining) greater than 2. <br />dll, install a French drain or other <br />discharge it on the down-gradient, <br />ce suggests that this is an effective <br />iding lined. gravel pits. <br />size the right.of a well owner to a <br />by shadowing or mounding effects <br />its pump. intake set at the lowest <br />a valid claim of injury to his water <br />~plo. 1961)). Further, the potential <br />gineer's review of the well permit <br />r the operation of the site. Still, <br />groundwater.in the azea, and to the <br />ur as a direct result of its mining ' <br />will commit to above described <br />states that they "shall indicate the <br />ater. to supply the. project water <br />:eley and the Consolidated Mutual <br />rge owns 25 Fulton Ditch shares, <br />•edit.. These shares are presently <br />;'s seven South Platte River sites; <br />on Pit.' Lafazge.also owns. 1:75 <br />sumptive use evaluation for these <br />future renewals of the combined <br />adgate delivery for 1.75 Brighton <br />nd water rights in the cpmbined .: <br />for all seven sites including post- <br />include in an approved plan of <br />with the. application for the Fort <br />!permit area; expired on illarch <br />pliance. with OSE requirements <br />