My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE30917
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE30917
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:42:49 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:48:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
8/17/1995
Doc Name
TRAPPER MINE NOV C-95-017 ABATEMENT DRAFT GEOTECHNICAL & HYDROGEOLOGICAL STUDY OF THE ASHMORE REC
From
DMG
To
JOE DUDASH
Violation No.
CV1995017
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo to Joe Dudaeh <br />Trapper Landslide - Hydro-Geo Report <br />page 2 <br />(3) "During recontouring of the slide area a bulldozer should be <br />used to decrease the permeability of the top layer of the <br />spoils. Several runs by the bulldozer on top of the reclaimed <br />surface should be sufficient to substantially reduce the <br />infiltration potential." <br />The Division will need additional detail before it can render an <br />opinion regarding these specific recommendations. <br />(1) A simple smoothing of the existing extensional graben trench <br />surrounding the landslide block will not be acceptable to the <br />Division. Care will be necessary to prevent this trench shape <br />from acting as an infiltration gallery, which would contribute <br />moisture to the basal plane of the failed spoil block. <br />However, the operator should also avoid reloading the failed <br />mass. A specific regrading scheme should be proposed. The <br />lower portions of the extensional zone on each side of the <br />landslide mass might be convenient locations for the placement <br />of trenched gravel drains to express any infiltrating water. <br />(2) Particular attention should be paid to a toe ditch to convey <br />any water effluent from the failed mass. <br />(3) Is it the intention of this recommendation to recompact the <br />entire upper horizon of the failed spoil block, or merely the <br />regraded areas? Care will have to be taken to remove and <br />replace topsoil. Otherwise overcompaction of topsoil will <br />retard revegetation. Further, over compaction of earthen <br />materials may only result in a transient benefit. If these <br />soils exhibit any swelling potential, exposure to moisture <br />will cause them to swell, lowering their density and <br />increasing their permeability. Swell/consolidation tests <br />should be performed to determine the equilibrium density of <br />these materials under field conditions. <br />(4) Saturation of the failed spoil mass might also be prevented by <br />enhancing drainage of the landslide mass. The installation of <br />a toe drain and axial trenched (french) gravel drains might <br />help to avoid resaturation of the mass. In the event that <br />regrading and recompaction do not prevent infiltration, drains <br />will intercept and depress the saturated surface. <br />The Division should review and approve the specific proposed <br />remedial actions as a portion of the Technical Revision required as <br />a portion of the abatement of NOV 95-17. The application should <br />include a work plan and schedule for completion of the remedial <br />actions. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.