Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> 'fAY ^ ^ .~~~. <br />GORSUC H, KIRGIS, CAMPBELL, WALKER , AND DROVER <br /> M~iN{i~ ~. .. <br /> ATTORNEYS AT LAW <br />;'IC^I lFA6Yir1ti rl~rl^• <br /> iOl N. USU DE AVE. '-' <br /> SUITE 310 <br />TNONIAS w. ,/AWES COLORADO SRRING S. COLORADO DENVER Own CE <br />TAw MT W. AMERS <br />•NNE T <br />NELSON 9ODO3~Ig22 y~ • YL~y~T (~ p ,~ •[mI~ENTEENTw $T, <br />l {-' Y ~ <br />~ yCITL •OO <br />. . <br />'- ~ <br />~ <br /> TELEPHONE AI91 633-8081 ~-~ ~ - <br />- <br />-g~x meo <br /> DENVER LINE(3031 820-9020 DENVER, CO e02n <br /> TELECO PIER (]191 635-Ba g1 ^ /n~ <br />~ ~ `~ 11 ~ ~ <br />N <br /> _ JO3) 5J <br />200 <br /> <br />May 2, 1990 TELECO Pi[R <br />tviiN~U V~I•... I]0312D B-0215 <br /> ~c~l ~;,dpTiCN f;".r~~ <br />Mr. Daniel Z. Hernandez <br />Reclamation Specialist <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Re: Analysis of "Final Design Analysis for HR-6 Snyder 4uarry <br />CAP" Proposal, Castle Concrete Company, Snydlar Quarry, <br />Permit No. M-77-210 <br />Dear Mr. Hernandez: <br />I am writing in response to your April 13, 1990 letter <br />directed to Obering, Wurth ~ Associates in connection with the <br />above-referenced proposal. As I have indicated to you Suring our <br />prior telephone conversation, this firm represents four of the five <br />Lenders who now own a substantial portion of the property known as <br />Cedar Heights Subdivision, Colorado Springs, Colorado. <br />Z received a copy of the Final Design Analysis for HR-6 Snyder <br />Quarry CAP on March 21, 1990. A consulting engineer has been <br />retained to review the options contained in that proposal, as well <br />as the additional options outlined in the Mined Land Reclamation <br />Division Memorandum from John T. Doerfer to Dan Hernandez dated <br />April 4, 1990. Z anticipate that it will take a week tc two weeks <br />before I will have the results of our consulting engineer's review. <br />After I have had an opportunity to discuss the consulting <br />eng'ineer's review with my clients, I will contact Castle Concrete <br />Company to advise it of the Lenders' position on t2~e options <br />outlined in Castle Conrete Company's proposal as well as the <br />additional options detailed in the NLRB Memorandum dated April 4, <br />1990. <br />Should you have any questions regarding any of ~.he above, <br />please feel free to give me a call. <br />