My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE30812
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE30812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:42:47 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:46:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
12/10/1992
Doc Name
COLOWYO COAL CO C-81-019 MR-22 REVISION OF BLASTING SKETCHES TDN X-92-02-0244-2 TV-2
From
DMG
To
COLOWYO COAL CO
Violation No.
CV1992030
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII` <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Roam 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: 13031 866-3567 <br />FAX: 13031832-8106 <br />December 10, 1992 <br />Richard Atkinson <br />Director of Lands and Environmental Affaus <br />Colowyo Coal Company <br />5731 State Highway 13 <br />Meeker, CO 81641 <br />RE: Colowyo Coal Mine (C-81-019) <br />MR-22: Revision of blasting sketches; TDN X-92-02-0244-2 TV-2 <br />Dear Mr. Atkinson: <br />OF.~~[~ <br />~~_ <br />'~~ <br />Ne %~ <br />~, <br />r8]6 ~ <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long . <br />Division Direclar <br />The Division has had the opportunity to review the three blasting reports submitted by Colowyo <br />on November 25, 1992. Thank you for submitting those reports. Based upon our review there <br />appears to be several discrepancies between the information found in the text and that found <br />in the sketch portions of the blasting reports. The Division has the following adequacy concerns <br />that need to be addressed: <br />Overburden Blast -November 24, 1992: <br />1. The number of holes per delay given in the text (6) does not agree with the maximum <br />number of holes per delay shown in the sketch (7) nor does it agree with the maximum <br />number of holes per delay that could be present if there were eight rows in the blast <br />pattern, as is indicated by the eight found on the left margin of the sketch (8). Please <br />explain. <br />2. The value given in the text for pounds of explosives per delay (5,724) does not agree <br />with the amounts calculated by the Division given the number of holes per delay <br />indicated by the sketch (7 x 954 = 6,678) or indicated by margins of the sketch (8 x 954 <br />= 7,632). Please verify the number of holes per delay. <br />3. 't'he maximum weight of explosives that was fired during any 8 ms period on November <br />24, 1992 does not appear to be in compliance with Rule 4.08.4 of the regulations if the <br />there were, indeed, eight holes in some delays. The Division's calculations for <br />determining this are as follows: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.