Laserfiche WebLink
<br />III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING <br />Red'amation and Enfurcemem <br />Washington, D.C. ?OY40 <br />AUG 2 2 1994 <br />Mr. Steve G. Renner <br />Coal Program Supervisor <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Renner: <br />AUU 26' <br />,::,::,, <br />a c' ~.;il <br />~"' iti d <br />s <br />c`~"~"Y <br />Thank you for your letter of June 30 requesting informal review of the <br />Albuquerque Field Office (AFO) Director's determination that your agency did <br />not take appropriate action with respect to ten-day notice (TDN) number 94- <br />020-352-002 (Kerr Coal Company (Kerr-, permit number C-80-0061. <br />The violation alleged in the TDN is a failure to return areas disturbed by <br />surface coal mining operations to their approximate original contour (AOC1; <br />primarily that portion of Pit #1 located on non-Federal land, <br />The inspection that led to the TDN was conducted pursuant to a request for <br />a Phase I bond release which itself indicates that Kerr believed that it had <br />completed the backfilling, regrading and drainage control of the bonded area <br />in accordance with the reclamation plan of the approved permit. This plan <br />had been modified in 1990 and 1993 seemingly to accommodate for the <br />present ground configuration. Four months prior to approving the latter <br />modification, the AFO, in conjunction with our Western Support Center, <br />conveyed its concerns to you about spoil shortages that would significantly <br />interfere with achieving AOC in Pits #1 and #740 of the mine. <br />You state that both your office and the permittee are satisfied that the <br />approved plan complies with the letter and spirit of applicable AOC <br />regulations. The TDN was, however, issued on the basis that even though <br />the current ground configuration may comply with the approved plan, this <br />configuration nonetheless clearly violates the AOC requirements of State <br />Rule 4.14.11211a1. <br />