My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE30002
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE30002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:36:53 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:28:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981039
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
2/21/1991
Doc Name
ROCKCASTLE CO-GRASSY GAP MINE PN C-81-039 BOND RELEASE REQUEST ADEQUACY RESPONSES
From
MLRD
To
BRENT C ANDERSON
Violation No.
CV0000000
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~~ <br />Mr. Brent Anderson <br />Page Three <br />February 6, 1991 <br />approximately 300 feet long be constructed to replace the culvert as shown on Figure <br />2, Lower Pit 5 & Access Road -Proposed Drainage Configuration. Channel design <br />calculations and a description of design methodology are presented in Attachment 2 <br />to the Bond Release Request Responses. <br />,ll <br />In order to maintain access for the light use road which presently crosses Culvert 5-3, pj o ~ <br />low gradient (4H:1~ access ramps will be incorporated in the engineered channel ~!J`~~ ~` <br />segment at the crossing Location. Exposed sideslopes at the vehicular crossing will be ~~'~`' t2~(c~ <br />armored as appropriate to minimize erosion. x,033 <br />FEATURE 5 <br />The existing contour ditch which intercepts and routes runoff from the northeast end <br />of the Pit 5 reclaimed area to the Pit 5 access road ditch is excessively steep as -~,,,~ °" ~"~, <br />described in the previous letter report (ACZ Inc., 10/1/90). As a result, the contour ;~ ^ ~ Ut <br />ditch and the downgradient access road ditch show evidence of progressive 't a r'"e <br />downcutting and erosion. As recommended in the previously referenced report and ~ e ~° <br />shown on Figure 2, Lower Pit 5 ~ Access Road -Proposed Drainage Configuration, itv~ ~~"'~ <br />is proposed that the contour ditch be relocated to reduce overall gradient to 1-2 ~d~~t° <br />percent and the existing ditch be reclaimed by regrading and revegetating the ditch ¢\`~~+`~' <br />area. The relocated contour ditch will be approximatey the same size and <br />configuration as the existing ditch and will be revegetated by broadcast seeding upon <br />completion. <br />FEATURE 4 <br />As described' in the previous report (ACZ, 10/1 /90) on the Pit 5 area, there is some rill <br />and gully erosion on and along the sides of the Pit 5 access road. The most significant <br />erosion occurs below the junction of the existing contour ditch described in the <br />preceding section. Erosion becomes relatively severe near the inlet of Culvert 5-4. <br />Minor rill and gully erosion on the road surtace can be addressed by regrading the road <br />surface to eliminate flow channels, eliminating the ditch on the east side of the road and <br />sloping the road to the west, installation of water bars or swales across the road at <br />intervals of 70-100 feet, and revegetation of the road surface. <br />In order to effectively address the more significant erosion on the west side of the <br />access road, it is proposed that eroded areas be backfilled and the entire ditch be <br />regraded to the design configuration detailed in Attachment 2 to the Bond Release <br />Request Responses. Existing erosion of the west ditch is a reflection of high <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.