My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-08-09_REVISION - M1980193
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1980193
>
2005-08-09_REVISION - M1980193
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2021 2:47:29 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:27:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1980193
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
8/9/2005
Doc Name
objection
From
ted keuer
To
dmg
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ted Keller <br />9950 Soap Weed Rd <br />Calhan, CO 80808 <br />August 7, 2005 <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />To Whom It May Concern: <br />In addition to the letter dated August 1, 2005, there aze several more concerns that need <br />to be pointed out regarding the expansion of the Sokol Gravel Pit application (Pit #M- <br />1980-193). <br />I move to my property in December of 2003, at that time the gravel pit was not in <br />operation. It has since been reopened and resumed operation. The truck traffic on some <br />days is very heavy and creates a lot of dust and noise pollution. <br />Now I find that there is an application for expansion of the site, not only for gravel <br />operations but for other operations too (asphalt and/or concrete plant). My concern is the <br />sign posted at the property is misleading. It specifically states that a "reclamation <br />permit" (see attached photo of sign) has been applied for, not a nearly 10 fold increase in <br />size and additional operations permit has been applied for. I find it hazd to trust the <br />under:y ing motive of a company that can not be honest in its intentions. <br />This company has applied for an "open-ended" permit for operations it doesn't know the <br />scope of (gravel operations) and for operations it can not project (asphalt or concrete, <br />maybe both). <br />As a neighbor of the proposed operation that will have to deal with the long-term <br />problems created by this operation, I urge you to deny this permit. <br />Please inform me of your intentions regazding this permit. <br />Thank you, <br />Ted Keller <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.