Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(STATE OF CO ~ORAaO aiC~-aD o. L•W. ~•~^•' <br />DEFAitTxifNi OF NATUaAL 0.ESOURGES <br />D. Mona Pa~COa, Eaaartnt Diraetpr <br />E 1FiINED LAND RECLA'VIATION <br />y~~I i._.,-._ <br />423 Centennial building. t3t3 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Coloretlo 80203 Tel.i303) 839-3567 <br />June 30, I9BI <br />TO: Bob Llddle <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton <br />David C. 5helton~ ~ `r <br />Director , ~~~-~b ~,~,ab~' <br />Jiff. 3198~~ .~ <br />SUBJECT: Geotechnical as s. of Energy Feels xo. 3 Permit Rpplieatioa <br />Pursuant to your request I have reviewed the Energy Fuels No. 3/Middle <br />Creek pe_-manent program permit epp2ication. I fozward the following commenrs <br />regarding the geotechniceI aspects of the permit: for your consideration. <br />Grading and Backfilling <br />The application states that it is the applicant's intent to backfil2 the <br />surface pits and the portal area alt to approximate original contour, The <br />- "'-" applicant further requests a variance from required ccn:emporaneous reclamation <br />within the portal and surrounding area. The purposes for this request are <br />to allow aortal access and to facilitate placement for underground waste rock <br />(2 ft. of roof rack removed to assure roof stability) throughout the SG-year <br />projected life span of the Middle Creek underground mine. <br />` The application is dufficient in two facets of its backfilling and grading <br />proposal. First, the material bulking calculations are based upon very <br />limited materials field density testing which utilizes "wet density" results. <br />I do not believe this determination is sufficient. The applicant should <br />conduct additional testing including determtination and comparison of results <br />using dry material densities. Comparison of dry densities will eliminate the <br />possibility of confusion due to moisture variation between the samples. The <br />testing submitted within the application is limited to one in-place overburden <br />test and approximately a half dozen spoil sample sites. The applicant should <br />expand the testing program to include multiple ir.-place undisturbed overburden <br />samples designed to test the representative overburden stratigraahic types. <br />Furthermore, testing of disturbed spoil should include both the permanent and <br />temporary overburden piles, which have been consclidated to varying degrees. <br />Secondly, the application contains only a brief calculation of overall spoil <br />bulking, including allowance for coal removal. The application should be <br />amended to detail volume calculations far the separate project pits, the portal <br />area and the permanent and temporary overburden piles. Further, a detailed <br />calculation summary of the projected underground waste material volume should <br />be included. This should allow verification of the applicant's statements re- <br />garding the excess nature of the various overburden piles and veri °:cati.on of <br />their projection of regraded approximate original contour. <br />