Laserfiche WebLink
<br />RATIONALE FOR PROPOSED CIVIL PENALTY <br />CESSATION ORDER N0. C-85-032 <br />On April 5, 1985, Mined Land Reclamation Division (MLRD) conducted an <br />inspection of the New Elk Mine. The inspector was Gregg R. Squire. <br />Jack Snow, Chief Engineer at the mine, accompanied the inspector. <br />During the inspection, two problems were noted. Both of those problems were <br />related to a failure to minimize disturbance to the hydrologic balance, <br />therefore, only one Cessation Order was issued. The two issues involved were <br />as follows: <br />1. While examining the raw coal pile, a discharge was noted coming <br />from a water hose leading out of the sump under the raw coal pile <br />conveyor system. The discharge water was being pumped from the <br />sump up onto the raw coal pile pad. From there it was flawing <br />across the pad in a southerly direction to the upper end of a <br />culvert which had been installed for a crossing over the Purgatoire <br />River diversion. At that point, the discharge from the sump was <br />entering the diverted Purgatoire River flow. In summary, water <br />from a disturbed area was being discharged into the river without <br />any treatment. <br />2. The second problem was discovered when inspecting Sediment Pond <br />No. 006. There was evidence that there had been a recent discharge <br />from the pond through the emergency spillway. There was a dark <br />stain of what may have been floc material and/or rock and coal <br />fines about six inches above the level of the bottom of the <br />spillway. The spillway was also damp, and the lower end of the <br />spillway channel, where it intercepted the old Purgatoire River <br />channel, had recently been eroded to a depth of approximately one <br />foot. Any flow leaving the emergency spillway of Pond 006 would go <br />from that point in the old channel, back into the existing river <br />channel near where the diverted channel returned to the original <br />river bed. <br />After observing the evidence of a recent discharge from Pond 006, <br />it was learned from personnel at the mine that during the previous <br />evening a new second shift had begun working at the cleaning <br />plant. Apparently, a valve had inadvertently been left open <br />allowing plant make-up water to flow into the thickener tank until <br />it overflowed and began to spill into Pond 006. This continued <br />until the pond filled and began to spill over at the emergency <br />spillway. Mr. Snow indicated that he didn't know at what time the <br />pond had filled, but that at about 4:00 a.m. a security guard <br />noticed the flow from the tank and that the valve was then closed. <br />This flow into the river from the cleaning plant was not permitted <br />under the operations NPDES Permit. It also was not permitted under <br />MLRD's permit. Not only were materials from the thickener tank <br />entering the river, but by discharging water from the tank into the <br />pond, the ponds capacity to store storm water runoff had been <br />diminished. <br />