My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1990-01-25_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1988112
>
1990-01-25_REVISION - M1988112 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2021 10:54:03 AM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:19:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1988112
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
1/25/1990
Doc Name
REPORTERS TRANSCRIPT OF PUBLIC HEARING TESTIMONTY OF PHILIP HOCKER
Type & Sequence
AM1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i, <br /> 11 <br />' 1 slurry deposition method, this is probably going to <br /> 2 work about as projected, but even that is not <br />' 3 accuratel <br />d <br />l <br />d i <br />th <br /> y mo <br />e <br />e <br />n <br />e permit application. But <br /> 4 in winter conditions, in rainfall or low temperature <br /> 5 conditions, which at this elevation of 8600 feet are <br />' 6 going to be quite common, the low temperature <br /> 7 conditions, the tailings as deposited may well <br /> 8 entrain a substantial amount of the HCN which will <br /> 9 not be released, and once it's entrained in that <br /> 10 l <br />it <br />i <br />l <br />i <br /> s <br />urry, <br />w <br />volat <br />l <br />lize extremely slowly. <br />' 11 So I think that we can't assLame that <br /> 12 these tailings, as deposited, are going t:o be <br /> 13 benign. The only lab test that we have i.s a very <br /> 14 limited sample and, frankly, didn't model the <br />' 15 variety of field conditions which will affect the <br /> 16 actual tailings deposits, so I think that we should <br />' <br /> 17 be treating this tailing deposit as a hazardous <br />1 18 waste facility. <br /> 19 The liner that's proposed is actually a <br />' 20 step backwards from the liner that was proposed for <br /> 21 the heap leach facility. The heap leach facility <br />' 22 li <br />d it -- <br />d <br />ob <br />l <br />h <br />I <br />i <br /> ner, as <br />rea <br />an <br />, <br />v <br />ous <br />y, we <br />ave <br /> 23 people here who are expert on that -- did include a <br /> 24 granular layer and leak detection from the granular <br />' 25 layer below the synthetic. <br />AGREN, BLANDO & BILLINGS <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.