My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE29532
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE29532
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:36:31 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:17:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
12/21/1993
Doc Name
ERRATA PAGE 12/20/1993 RESPONSE TO 10 DAY NOTICE X-93-020-370-005-TV-3
From
DMG
To
OSM
Violation No.
TD1993020370005TV3
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIiiilii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1l 17 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, CO 80203 <br />Phone: 1703) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (3071 832-8106 <br />December 21, 1993 <br />Mr, Robert H. Hagen <br />Office of Surface Mining <br />505 Marquette NW Suite 1200 <br />Albuquerque, NM 87102 <br />~~= b <br />~`~,' <br />o <br />'rare' <br />Roy Romrr <br />Governor <br />Michael B. Long <br />Drvi~ion Director <br />RE: Errata Page, December 20, 1993 Response to Ten Day Notice <br />X-93-020-370-005 TV-3 <br />Dear Mr. Hagen: <br />On December 20, 1993, the Division submitted to the Albuquerue <br />Field Office our reaponae to the above Ten Day Notice. Upon <br />review of our response, two typographical errors were found that <br />may create some confusion in your review of our reaponae. <br />In the first paragraph on Page 2 of the Division's response, the <br />third sentence reads "For the purposes of even further assuring <br />that the room and pillar operations would not create surface <br />subsidence effects, compliance with Rule 2.05.6(6)(b)(ii) and <br />7.05.6(6)(1) was specifically required..." The second regulatory <br />citation should have read 2.05.6(6)(c). <br />In the second paraphgraph on page 2, the last sentence reads "As <br />such, surveys of these five structures have not being conducted." <br />This should read "..have not been conducted." <br />We apologize for any confusion that these errors may have caused. <br />The Division respectfully requests our December 20, 1993 response <br />be amended to reflect these corrections. Please call me if you <br />have any further concerns. <br />Sincerely, <br />Daniel I. Hernandez `~ <br />Senior Environmental Protection Specialist <br />m:\osa\acm\hagen2,ltr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.