My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE29353
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE29353
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:36:23 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:14:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981013
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
3/15/2001
Doc Name
DMG RESPONSE TO ISSUE RAISED BY BOARDS ATTORNEY REGARDING DMGS AUTHORITY TO VACATE A NOV WHEN OPERAT
Violation No.
CV2000009
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
999 <br />BEFORE THE MINED LAND ) VACATION WITHOUT <br />PREJUDICE <br />RECLAMATION BOARD ) <br />NOTICE OF VIOLATION <br />IN RE BASIN RESOURCES, INC. ) CV. N0.2000-009 <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY'S RESPONSE TO ISSUE <br />RAISED BY BOARD'S ATTORNEY REGARDING DMG'S AUTHORITY TO <br />VACATE A NOTICE OF VIOLATION WHEN OPERATOR HAS <br />REQUESTED A HEARING BEFORE THE BOARD <br />The Division of Minerals and Geology (DMG), through its counsel responds to an <br />issue raised by the Mined Land Reclamation Boazd's (Board) counsel in an informal <br />conference with counsel for all parties on March 15, 2001, as follows: <br />INTRODUCTION <br />On March 14, counsel for DMG received a telephone call from the Board's counsel <br />asking that he attend an informal conference with him and the other parties' counsel <br />to this case the following day, regarding a procedural issue he perceived. At the <br />informal conference the next day, the Board's counsel stated his view that DMG has <br />no authority to vacate a notice of violation under the coal program after the NOV has <br />been sent to the operator and after the operator has asked for a formal Board heanng <br />on the NOV under Rule 5.03.5(1)(a) of the Rules of the Colorado Mined Land <br />Reclamation Board for Coal Mining (Rules). The Board's counsel noted that the <br />NOV in this case was issued to Basin Resources, Inc. (Basin) on November 1, 2000, <br />and that Basin had formally requested a Board hearing on November 13, 2000. <br />According to the Boazd's counsel, once Basin asked for the Boazd hearing under Rule <br />5.03.5(1)(a), the matter was vested within the Board's jurisdiction, and DMG no <br />longer had the authority to vacate the NOV. As I understand the Board's attorney's <br />position, the only way an NOV can be vacated, with or without prejudice, once an <br />operator has asked for a Board hearing under Rule 5.03.5(1)(a), is for the Board to act <br />to vacate the NOV. According to the Board's attorney, his view is that though DMG <br />can request the Board to vacate after the request for a hearing by the operator, only <br />the Board can vacate the NOV-DMG has no further authority to unilaterally or by <br />agreement with the operator vacate an NOV. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.