Laserfiche WebLink
United States Department of the Interior <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING <br />Reclamation and Enforcement <br />Suite 1200 <br />$0$ Muqueuc Avenuc N.W. <br />Albuquerque, New Maim 87102 <br />December 7, 1994 <br />RECEIVED <br />DEC 0 9 1994 <br />Division of Minerals 8 Geology <br />Permit: C-81-029 <br />Hine Name: Meadows #1 <br />CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT: #P 079 749 3e5 <br />Mr. Michael B. Long, Director <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />215 Centennial Building <br />1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Dear Mr. Long: <br />The enclosed Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSM) <br />inspection report identifies violations that were considered to have <br />existed at the time of the last State complete inspection (LSCI) but had <br />not been cited. <br />Date of Federal Inspection: 11/30/94 ; Date of LSCI: 10/24/94 <br />The determination that the State did not cite the violation is based on <br />one or more of the following reasons: <br />The condition was identified in a State inspection report but no <br />State enforcement action was taken. <br />Design criteria or required certification has not been met for a <br />structure in existence as of the last State complete inspection <br />(sediment pond, excess spoil fill, etc.). <br />Necessary controls that were required at the time of the last <br />State complete inspection have not been established (diversion <br />ditches, sediment ponds, top soil protection, signs and markers, <br />etc.). <br />X Site conditions indicate that the violation(s) noted had been in <br />existence at the time of, or prior to, the last State complete <br />inspection. <br />Other: (give explanation). <br />Although the violations were cited by the State, or were abated during a <br />joint inspection, OSM believes that the violations were evident during <br />the last State complete inspection. <br />