My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE29338
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE29338
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:36:22 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:14:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981029
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
1/9/1995
Doc Name
MSEIR FORM FOR NOVEMBER 30 1994 MEADOWS MINE INSPECTION C-81-029
From
DMG
To
OSM
Violation No.
CV1994036
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iii iiiiiiiiiiiii iii <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmenl of Natural Resources ~~~~~ <br />1313 Sherman 51., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 866-3567 <br />FAX. 13031 832-8106 <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />January 9, 1995 NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />Roy Romer <br />Mr. Stephen G. Rathbun Governor <br />Office of Surface Mining Tames S. Lochhead <br />Albuquerque Field Office Executive Direcror <br />505 Marquette Avenue NW, Suite 1200 Mi<naele.Eons <br />Albuquerque, NM 87102 Div ision Director <br />RE: MSEIR form for November 30, 1994 Meadows Mine Inspection <br />C-81-029 <br />Dear Mr. Rathbun: <br />Enclosed is the MSEIR form for the impoundment related violation <br />cited by DMG at the recent Meadows Mine inspection. I would like <br />to take this opportunity to clarify four points made in the OSM <br />inspection report which was issued following the inspection. <br />1.) The report indicates a concern with the post-mine topography. <br />The report mentions that approval of the backfilling and grading <br />plan which was implemented ten years ago may not be in compliance <br />with Colorado's program. As you are aware, and as the Division has <br />discussed with the Albuquerque Field Office, the Division is <br />formulating a written AOC policy and hopes to resolve questions of <br />interpretation of this policy with the OSM during the next few <br />months. <br />We believe a number of programmatic questions related to AOC need <br />to be clearly answered prior to any further evaluations of AOC <br />matters by field inspectors, particularly at sites which have <br />already been reclaimed and released from liability associated with <br />backfilling and grading efforts. The AFO has agreed with this <br />approach. <br />2.) The report indicates the Northwest sediment trap is a sediment <br />pond. As a result of recent permitting and enforcement actions, <br />the Division has required the operator to meet the regulatory <br />requirements for this structure as an impoundment. However. this <br />structure is not a sediment pond. It is a temporary impoundment <br />subject to the regulatory requirements of Rule 4.05.9(2). The <br />structure intercepts disturbed area runoff, reducing the velocity <br />and retaining sediment before the runoff reaches the sediment pond <br />which is directly downhill from the impoundment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.