My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1997-06-12_REVISION - M1981302 (6)
DRMS
>
Day Forward
>
Revision
>
Minerals
>
M1981302
>
1997-06-12_REVISION - M1981302 (6)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2022 4:24:27 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:13:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981302
IBM Index Class Name
Revision
Doc Date
6/12/1997
Doc Name
CLARIFICATION TO PROPOSED PRE HEARING CONFERENCE ORDER
Type & Sequence
AM2
Media Type
D
Archive
No
Tags
DRMS Re-OCR
Description:
Signifies Re-OCR Process Performed
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII RECEIVED <br /> 999 JUN 12 1997 <br /> BEFORE THE MINED LAND RECLAMATION BOARD Division of minerais&Geology <br /> STATE OF COLORADO <br /> File No. M-81-302 <br /> CLARIFICATION (OR OBJECTION) TO PROPOSED PRE-HEARING CONFERENCE <br /> ORDER <br /> IN THE MATTER OF THE WESTERN MOBILE - DEEPE FARM PIT - AMENDMENT <br /> 02 <br /> The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Boulder (BOCC) <br /> submits this request for a clarification of, or (as appropriate) <br /> an objection to, the Proposed Pre-Hearing Conference Order <br /> entered in this matter dated June 8, 1997 and received by the <br /> BOCC on June 11, 1997. The grounds for this requested <br /> clarification or objection are as follows: <br /> Paragraph #1 of the "Issues to be Considered" on page 2 of the <br /> Proposed Pre-hearing Order states the relevant issue as <br /> [wJhether proposed changes to the berm, which have been <br /> styled as a Technical Revision ("TR") and are not now <br /> included in the Amendment Application, properly <br /> constitute part of the Amendment and should be <br /> considered as part of the Amendment? <br /> The Board submits that this issue is broader, and includes <br /> whether the scope of review of the so-called "Technical Revision" <br /> should encompass not just the grading changes to the berm, but <br /> the entire berm feature itself. The basis for the BOCC's <br /> position that the flood-control implications of the entire berm <br /> are properly at issue in this amendment application is set forth <br /> in detail in the BOCC's letter of supplemental objections dated <br /> May 8, 1997, which is attached as Exhibit A to the BOCC's Pre- <br /> hearing Statement filed in this matter. See also the letter of <br /> the Assistant Boulder City Attorney dated May 13, 1997; the Pre- <br /> hearing Statement of the City of Boulder; the memorandum from <br /> Allen Sorenson of the DMG to Gregg Squire of the DMG dated May <br /> 26, 1997; and any other pertinent material already of record in <br /> these matters (AM-002 and TR-006) . <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.