Laserfiche WebLink
April 5, 2002 Objection, Jennifer and Joseph Wheeling, dated April 4, 2002. <br />April 8, 2002 Objection, W. Jeffrey Torrence, dated April 2, 2002. <br />April 8, 2002 Objection, C. A. Rau, Jr., P.E., and M. G. Rau, dated April 3, 2002. <br />April 8, 2002 Objection, John R. Sobers, dated April 2, 2002. <br />April 8, 2002 Objection, Milan J. McMannis, dated April 3, 2002. <br />April 8, 2002 Objection, Dan James, not dated. <br />April 8, 2002 Objection, David M. and Linda K. James, dated April 8, 2002. <br />April 8, 2002 Close of Public Comment Period. <br />April 23, 2002 Pre-hearing Conference <br />May 15, 2002 DMG approval recommendation <br />May 22, 2002 Formal Public Hearing, 97"' day of application <br />June 14, 2002 120"' day of application <br />June 26, 2002 June MLRB meeting, 132'"' day of application <br />ISSUES TO BE CONSIDERED (as outlined in the Proposed Pre-hearing Order) <br />1. Has the app/icant provided an adequate engineering stability analysis for the <br />proposed final rec/aimed s/open of the riverbank and astab/e post-mining topography? (34- <br />3Z.5-116(41(i/ and Exhibif 6 5 (ZJ of the Rues and ReguJationsJ <br />See staff response under issues 5 and 6 of DMG's Rationale for Approval Recommendation. Staff <br />determined that the requirements of Rule 6.5(2) and of C.R.S. 34-32.5-116(4)(1) were satisfied in <br />the plans submitted for AM-01 . <br />2. Wi// a/1 surface areas of the affected /and within the proposed amendment area be <br />stabilized and protected to effectively control erosion? (34-32.5-116(4J(h/ and Rule <br />3.1.6/311 <br />See staff response under issues 5, 6, 7 and 10 of DMG's Rationale for Approval <br />Recommendation. Staff determined that the requirements of Rule 3.1.6(3) and C.R.S. 34-32,5- <br />11 6(4)(h) were satisfied in the plans submitted for AM-01 . <br />(end) <br />