My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE28932
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE28932
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:36:05 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:06:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980006
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
10/4/1994
Doc Name
APPLICATIONS FOR REVIEW & TEMPORARY RELIEF
Violation No.
TD1994020352002TV1
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
.~, <br />iii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />UNITED STATES OF AMERICA <br />DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR <br />OFFICE OF HEARINGS AND APPEALS <br />HEARINGS DIVISION <br />KERR COAL COMPANY, <br />Applicant, <br />v. <br />OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING <br />RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, <br />Respondent <br />Docket No. DV 94-12-R <br />Applications for Review <br />and Temporary Relief <br />Notice of Violation <br />No. 94-020-352-003 <br />Marr Strip Mine, Colorado <br />OSM REPLY HRZEF <br />The Respondent, Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and <br />Enforcement (OSM), replies to certain statements made in the <br />proposed decision submitted in this matter on September 20, 1994, <br />by the Applicant, Kerr Coal Company (Kerr). <br />I. <br />DISCUSSION. <br />1. The DMG [Colorado's Division of Minerals and <br />Geology] and OSM (inspectors Steve Rathbun and <br />Henry Austin) conducted a joint inspection of the <br />Mine [Rerr's Marr Strip Mine near Walden, <br />Colorado] on March 31 - April 1, 1993. Tr.-I 159- <br />60. Mr. Austin reviewed the backfillinq and <br />grading sections of the Permit in connection with <br />the inspection. Tr.I-160. The OSM inspectors <br />discussed their concerns about whether backfillinq <br />and grading at the approved rate would comply with <br />the contemporaneous reclamation standard with the <br />DMG and Rerr. Tr.-I 162. The OSM inspectors, <br />however, expressed no concern about whether the <br />post-mining topography plans and maps for Pit 1, <br />as then approved by the DMG in the Permit, would <br />meet the AOC [approximate original contour] <br />standard. Tr.-I 163. <br />Kerr's proposed decision at 6. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.