Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Minutes prepared by: <br />to leave the channel as it is today, but since that may not be possible, he would like to <br />minimize the impact to the adjacent trees. Bryan Kohlenberg added that he had a <br />concern that there was a legal responsibility to provide capacity up to 150-cfs for the <br />Fulton Ditch. He will check into this and report back.. <br />l 1. Scott Franklin asked if the channel could be relocated to the east of the trees in the <br />area south of the confluence with First Creek. John Hickman said that a pond liner <br />had already been installed there and that overburdens had been balanced. <br />12. Scott Franklin added that he did not like the idea of 800-ft of hard and plastic lined <br />channel. He would prefer the lining to be more intermittent. He also needs to more <br />clearly understand why the heavy impact to the trees, south of the confluence with <br />First Creek, can't be avoided. John Hickman added that since the overall length of <br />channel had been increased, [here would be an overall increase in channel vegetation. <br />This may mitigate some of the impacts of the tree loss and wetlands loss due to [he <br />Seep relocation. Scott agreed and requested more information from John. <br />13. A question rose concerning how the crest of the drop on the Bull Seep Slough was <br />originally set by ICON. Craig Jacobson responded that it was set from estimates of <br />the channel invert from the Denver Water, January, 2001 mapping. Applegate and <br />Lidstone would investigate the crest elevation further. <br />14. Scott Franklin mentioned that the proposed First Creek channel appeared to impact <br />several trees. He added that again, he would prefer to save the trees. He would need <br />an explanation if they can't be saved due to the construction. <br />15. John Hickman provided a summary of issues that were to be addressed: <br />a. Bull Seep Crossing/UD&FCD access easement <br />b. Contouring of proposed modification to Reservoir B <br />c. Re-run hydrologic calculations for Bull Seep <br />d. Bryan Kohlenberg to look at legal requirements for Bull Seep capacity <br />e. Explanation to Scott Franklin for tree removal, channel hard points, and non- <br />we[land areas in the channel (grass-lined etc.). <br />f. Someone to initiate meeting with Brantner & Fulton Ditch Companies. <br />16. Comments regarding the design should be given to John Hickman via email, by <br />Thursday afternoon (11/15). <br />7. The next meeting was set for 9:30 AM. Wednesday, November 2] ~'. <br /> <br />Craig D. Jacobson, E.I.T. <br />ICON Engineering, Inc. <br />CC: Attendees, (email) <br />Barry Marrs, Brantner Ditch Company (email) <br />George McDonald, Fulton Ditch Company (Mail) <br />Dale <br />C:\\VI\UO\VS\7'[',liP\I 1- I ~ nh'uinc.duck':`D"' "'„~..-" ~ ' ~` " •„' • ~'•' <br />_____ c <br />