My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE28706
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE28706
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:35:55 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 12:02:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1992080
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/31/2000
Doc Name
Settlement Agreement
From
DMG
To
OAKRIDGE ENERGY INC
Violation No.
CV2000004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
- <br />SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT JUSTIFICATION <br />Carbon Junction Mine~Permit C-1992-030 <br />Notice of Violation # CV-2000-004 <br />James B. McArdle, Conference Officer ~/~~ <br />The Notice of Violation CV-2000-004 was issued on April 7, 2000 for failure to provide a name and <br />contact information for a resident agent, as required by Rule 2.03.4(2)(b). On play 30, 2000, an <br />Assessment Conference was held a[ 1313 Sherman Street, Room 314, Denver, Colorado. Mr. Harry <br />Ranney presented testimony regarding the Notice of Violation. Basically, a resident agent was not <br />available for the year 2000 firs[ and second quarter inspections. An agent was appointed on May I I, 2000. <br />The Proposed Civil Penalty by the Assessment Officer for NOV CV -2000-004 was: <br />History $0.00 <br />Seriousness $250.00 <br />Fault $250.00 <br />Number of Days Penalty Assessed 1 <br />Good Faith 0 <br />Ms. Sandra Pautsky provided testimony regarding the actions of the Company. After hearing this <br />testimony and considering the evidence presented, including the length of time that the Division tried to <br />correct this problem, I have come to the following conclusions: <br />HIStOCV <br />A $0.00 penalty is appropriate for history. <br />Seriousness <br />I concur that a $250.00 penalty is appropriate for seriousness. <br />Fault <br />I concur that the level of fault was that of negligence and that $250.00 is appropriate. <br />Number of Davs Penalty Assessed <br />I concur with ]day. <br />Good Faith. <br />I concur that good faith is not appropriate. <br />Settlement A¢reement Penal <br />History $0.00 <br />Seriousness $250.00 <br />Fault $250.00 <br />Number of Days Penalty Assessed 1 <br />Good Faith $0.00 <br />Total Penalty For NOV CV-2000-004 $500.00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.