My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE28408
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE28408
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:35:43 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:56:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981021
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
7/16/1981
Doc Name
ASSESSMENT CONFERENCE FOR BOURG STRIP MINE NOV 81-14 81-15 & 81-16 FN C-021-81
From
MLR
To
FLATIRON COMPANIES
Violation No.
CV0000000
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
;_ <br />i • <br />-3- <br />Notice of Violation 81-16 <br />I. $100.00 is assessed for the history component of this violation. <br />2. Based upon the evidence presented, the degree of seriousness is minimal. <br />The fact is that some topsoil was dispersed by the wind - a problem that is <br />of particular concern in the Walden area - but that the damage, duration and <br />extent was minimal, The Division proposes $350.00 for the seriousness component <br />of the civil penalty. <br />3. The degree of fault associated with this violation is negligence. The <br />topsoil should have been mulched and seeded immediately, under an approved <br />plan, but it was not done until after it was noted during the inspection. <br />Three days after the inspection the topsoil stockpile was stabilized. It <br />appears that this was a lack of diligence on the part of the operator. The <br />proposed amount for this component of the civil penalty is 5250.00. <br />4, Therefore, the total proposed civil penalty for this Notice of Violation is: <br />5100.00 for history <br />$350.00 for seriousness <br /> <br />$250.00 for Fault <br />$700.00 <br />Good Faith <br />Walden Coal Company does not present any arguments which warrant consideration <br />of good faith reductions in the proposed civil penalties. The company has <br />not met any of the abatement requirements for the Notices of Violation nor <br />did the company request any deadline extensions or modifications to the <br />abatement requirements. Good faith consideration, as presented in the <br />regulations, is given, "...if the person to whom the Notice of Violation... <br />was issued took extraordinary measures to abate the violation and that abate- <br />ment was achieved in the shortest possible time and before the expiration of <br />the time fixed for abatement in the notice..., or any modification thereof." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.