Laserfiche WebLink
<br />STATE OF iiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiu <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmem of Natural Resources <br />141 4 Sherman 51 , Room ? 15 <br /> <br />Denver, Colorado 8020} Ih~~ <br /> <br />Phunc: (1051 BeGJ567 I <br />FA%.171131 8 3 2~fl 106 <br /> DEPARTMENT OI <br /> NATURAI <br /> RESOURCE' <br />To: Larry P. Routten c~~e~oef <br /> Ken Saluar <br />From: Barbara L. Pavlik E.ecw ive Dueoo~ <br /> niichael B Long <br />Date: June 20, 1994 D~~-i~ion Dneuu~ <br />Re: NOV C-93-155 <br />Deserado Mine (C-81-018) <br />I have reviewed sections F.1 & F.3 of the draft OSM element- <br />specific oversight report with regard to the above referenced NOV <br />as you requested. An outline of the chronology of the NOV follows: <br />• December 16, 1994: NOV C-93-155 issued for a failure to <br />pass disturbed runoff through a sediment pond or <br />demonstrate SAE eligibility. <br />• December 31, 1993: Civil penalty of $1350 assessed. <br />• January 12, 1994: Request for Assessment Conference <br />received from operator. <br />• February 1, 1994: Assessment Conference held to address <br />this NOV along with others issued at the same time. <br />Assessment officer determined that NOV could be treated <br />as a permit deficiency rather than an NOV, because the <br />operator demonstrated that the areas in question had been <br />addressed verbally in the permit, although demonstrations <br />had not been made. This is documented in Western Fuels' <br />letter dated February 10, 1994 (received February 14, <br />1994) which included permit pages containing the <br />references to sediment control for these areas. <br />• February 18, 1994: NOV vacated. <br />If you have any further questions, please let me know. A copy of <br />the NOV file is attached. <br />BLP/blip <br />