My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ENFORCE27874
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Enforcement
>
ENFORCE27874
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2016 7:35:20 PM
Creation date
11/21/2007 11:45:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981020
IBM Index Class Name
Enforcement
Doc Date
5/3/2005
Doc Name
Notice of Proposed Amount of Civil Penalty
From
DMG
To
Central Appalachia Mining LLC
Violation No.
CV2005004
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment <br />Central Appalachia Mining, LLC /The Munger Canyon Mine <br />DMG Permit No. C-1981-020 / NOV CV-2005-004 <br />May 3, 2005 <br />Reviewed: DMG Insp Report (3/30/05); DMG NOV (4/7/05); Stover & Assoc memo (4/15/25); <br />D. Mathews memo (4/25/05); D. Mathews a-mail (4/28/05); DMG NOV Termination Notice (4/28/05). <br />History [Rule 5.04.5(3)(a)]: <br />No NOVs have been issued at this mine during the 12 months preceding the issuance of this NOV. <br />The History component is therefore proposed to be set at $0. <br />Seriousness [Rule 5.04.5(3)(b)]: <br />The Seriousness component of a proposed assessment may range from $0 to $1750. The amount <br />proposed depends upon whether the violation was one of performance requirements or one of <br />administrative requirements. This NOV was written for a violation of performance requirements. <br />In the case of a violation of performance requvements, the amount to be assessed For Seriousness <br />depends upon (I) the probability of the occurrence of the event which a violated standazd is <br />designed to prevent, and (2) the duration and extent of the potential or actual damage in terms of <br />area and impact on the public or environment. <br />(1) An adverse impact to the hydrologic balance did not occur, nor does it seem that it would <br />have occurred. Disturbance ofnon-salvaged topsoil did in fact occur. <br />(2) With regard to the missing CMP, actual damage to the environment did not occur, and <br />durntion and extent of potential damage to the environment that might have resulted from this <br />missing CMP seem low. With regard to the disturbance ofnon-salvaged topsoil, a small <br />amount of actual impact to the environment occurred. It appears that neither problem created <br />an actual nor a potential impact upon the public. <br />The Seriousness component of this assessment is therefore proposed to beset at $250. <br />Fault [Rule 5.04.5(3)(c)]: <br />The fault component of a proposed civil penalty assessment may range from $0 to $1500. <br />Assessments of "unavoidable" violations may range from $0 to $250. Assessments for violations <br />that were the result of "negligence" may range from $250 to $750. Assessments for violations that <br />resulted from "intentional conduct" may range from $750 to $1500. <br />Not installing CMP-3 prior to beginning construction of a new coal waste disposal azea, and <br />failing to salvage topsoil from the rock storage area, appear to be a moderate level of negligence. <br />The Fault component is therefore proposed to be set at $500. <br />Good Faith in Achieving Compliance [Rule 5.04.5(3)(d)]: <br />It appears the permittee took extra measures to abate these violations well ahead of the DMG- <br />established abatement deadlines. <br />Good faith credit of $250 is proposed. <br />The Total Proposed Civil Penalty Assessment for this NOV is therefore set at $500. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.